Odd arrangements and funny solutions are the proof of evolution—paths that a sensible God would never tread but that a natural process, constrained by history, follows perforce. No one understood this better than Darwin. Ernst Mayr has shown how Darwin, in defending evolution, consistently turned to organic parts and geographic distributions that make the least sense.
Indeed, evolution’s proof texts are always religious.
I’m not sure which is more disgusting, evolution’s hypocrisy or its self-promotion. Evolutionists proclaim their religious lies and hypocrisy as though the world will be impressed. And we hear it again and again.
I recently mentioned a protein named p53 that is yet another example of how science contradicts evolution. An evolutionist responded with the usual phony scientific arguments:
Well, one could predict that if TP53 is involved in so many systems / pathways that are fundamental to a host of cellular processes including (but probably not limited to) cell cycle regulation, apoptosis and senesence, then it had to have originated around the time that the simplest forms of multi-cellular life emerged and therefore would be present in the simplest of life forms as well as the most complex. One could also predict that the separate genetic changes that may have affected this gene as different lineages diversified would allow scientists to generate some sort of phylogeny maybe? Perhaps, TP53 may even be part of a larger 'super-family' of genes that have homologs and orthologs throughout multi-cellular life forms that also, through genetic analyses, appear to form some sort of hierarchy... If only scientists could find such a thing huh.
Oh yeah, the p53/p63/p73 superfamily. Highly conserved genes found all the way up from C.elegans to H.sapiens.
I'd post more links but don't see the point. The info is out there for those who wish to see it. No amount of linking to primary data or peer-reviewed journal articles will help those that don't want to.
CH, p53 is not a good example if you want to poke a stick at the ToE.
When I explained the scientific problems he responded with the usual religion:
Problem I have Mr. H is that even if I were to accept your points I still can't think of any credible alternative. The OT/genesis/creation is obviously a fairytale, or at best an allegory. I don't see how ID is anything other than a kind of anthropomorphic projection that will probably be as guilty of everything you claim is wrong with ToE.
In other words, scientific problems don’t count. Evolutionists are religious fundamentalists who must have evolution. They bring their religion into science and their religion requires a naturalistic creation story, regardless of how absurd. So they will spin whatever scientific-sounding arguments they can to prop up evolution.
Evolution is a religious Trojan Horse that has penetrated science and gone viral. Evolutionists have entered science though a different door. They abuse science, manipulating and perverting the obvious evidence as the need arises.