Darwin's God

Don’t Two Wrongs Make a Right? We’ve long since lost track of how many times the RNA World hypotheses—which states that life originated from...

A Video You can see this video where I look at Jerry Coyne’s recent blog on determinism and the denial of free will, and a couple of scient...

We’ve Learned Nothing Since Laplace Yesterday theoretical physicist Sabine Hossenfelder became the latest in a long line of smart people to ...

Evolution Creates Evolution As I have discussed many times, a single, run-of-the-mill, protein is beyond evolutionary explanation. The fit...

Darwin’s Dangerous Idea In a recent USA Today opinion piece evolutionist Nathan Lents states that the human race has “evolved through a ...

Seems Incompatible This week’s “we thought it was junk but it turned out to be crucial” study comes with the added bonus that the so-call...

I Had to Write “Evolution Is True” 500 Times I’ve been busy lately with a big landscaping job for the neighborhood evolutionist. He wanted...

A Step-By-Step Description How did proteins evolve? It is a difficult question because, setting aside many other problems, the very starti...

Information Organization A recent paper , authored by Winston Ewert, uses a dependency graph approach to model the relationships between t...

Ten Thousand Bits? Did you know Mars is going backwards? For the past few weeks, and for several weeks to come, Mars is in its retrograde ...

Guess Who Wins? The title of John Farrell’s article in Commonweal from earlier this year is a dead giveaway. When writing about the inte...

Pop Quiz: Who Said It? There are many fundamental problems with evolutionary theory. Origin of life studies have dramatically failed. Incr...

Numerous, Successive, Slight Modifications Proteins are a problem for theories of spontaneous origins for many reasons. They consist of do...

Bacterial Resistance to Antibiotics Rachel Gross’ recent article about evolutionist’s public outreach contains several misconceptions tha...

There You Go Again Why are evolutionists always wrong? And why are they always so sure of themselves? With the inexorable march of science...