The Religious
Beliefs of an Atheist
Lawrence
Krauss just finished his opening statement in the “What’s Behind It All? God, Science,and the Universe,” and he once demonstrated what drives evolutionary thought.
His arguments from dysteleology said it all. The universe, the physicist from Arizona
State University explained, is inhospitable. It is not user-friendly, and in
most places, would kill you instantly. And we all know that a Creator would
never do such a thing.
Evolutionists
have no idea how the world could have spontaneously arisen. They have no idea because
the science flatly contradicts evolution. But their metaphysics mandates
evolution.
Religion
drives science, and it matters.
Lawrence Krauss is such a weasel. He comes out with a lie and somehow gets away with it. It is a lie that Google’s AlphaGo program uses an evolutionary algorithm.
ReplyDeleteKraus continually spews out personal opinions as if they were facts. For example, he asserts that there is a lack of evidence for design in nature when, in fact, everything in nature is screaming evidence for design.
The fall changed everything and the bible said so. The universe does not work as it did on creation week.
ReplyDeleteAnyways SAYING god wouldn't do it this or that way is not evidenced by nature.
Its just human(tailless primates for some) reasoning from human observation of data.
The fall changed everything and the bible said so. The universe does not work as it did on creation week.
ReplyDeleteAnyways SAYING god wouldn't do it this or that way is not evidenced by nature.
Its just human(tailless primates for some) reasoning from human observation of data.
'It is not user-friendly, and in most places, would kill you instantly. And we all know that a Creator would never do such a thing.'
ReplyDeleteMy dear child, on the contrary, it is called 'the anthropic principle', allows for free will, and is, today, - thanks to the extraordi/nary advances made in physics, consistent with logic and theism, but not materialism, one of the mainstays of theism.
PS: Folks, the spell-checker does not recognise the term, anthropic'. Now, I wonder how that could have come about ? Gates is a secular-fundamentalist nut-job, isn't he ? Though the WP may not be Word.
Still, I've noticed facts inimical to favoured narratives of the bankers and the rest of the one percent, have a way of disappearing, when too much(!)[i.e. any] interest is shown in them.