tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post8517779375512165298..comments2024-01-23T02:32:28.567-08:00Comments on Darwin's God: DNA Repair Proteins: Efficiently Finding Genome ErrorsUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-3142726722107307022010-03-15T13:31:17.095-07:002010-03-15T13:31:17.095-07:00Hi Cornelius Hunter,
You wrote...
"The probl...Hi Cornelius Hunter,<br /><br />You wrote...<br /><i>"The problem is not that he did not give his hypothesis, the problem is that you don't acknowledge it."</i><br /><br />Which "he" are you talking about, the author of the Science Daily article or the five scientists who participated in the experiment?<br /><br />I didn't even see a reference to "evolution" from either source. However, it doesn't matter, since I am not about to let scientists make my conclusions for me even if they did the hard work of obtaining the data. I'm definitely not going to let a populist publisher do my thinking for me either.<br /><br />It's easy to throw stones at someone else's hypothesis without offering an alternative.<br /><br />It is even easier to throw stones at vague boogiemen regardless of how real the feeling of fear is.<br /><br />My hypothesis is the presumption that life and life processes evolved over billions of years is historically accurate. This would include the DNA repair process.<br /><br />However, I don't believe true randomness exists.<br /><br />Instead, I suggest life is quantum-based and the organized appearance of life (i.e. specified complexity) is the result of interconnected and orchestrated quantum effects.<br /><br />Since I also think consciousness is the result of organized quantum effects, it wouldn't be inaccurate to say life is consciously "designed".<br /><br />I am following the evidence wherever it leads. There is scientific support for this hypothesis (Quantum Biophysics) with more supporting evidence being discovered every day.<br /><br />What's more important, following the evidence and exploring alternative explanations or fighting the Culture War?<br /><br />Have you absolutely no interest in exploring the alternative explanation I have been forwarding on your blog?Thought Provokerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08288695859490482820noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-83796686102535057172010-03-15T13:23:42.437-07:002010-03-15T13:23:42.437-07:00This comment has been removed by the author.Thought Provokerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08288695859490482820noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-54744210187941199652010-03-15T11:51:32.529-07:002010-03-15T11:51:32.529-07:00From the abstract- thanks Dave-
"How DNA rep...From the abstract- thanks Dave-<br /><br /><i>"How DNA repair proteins sort through a genome for damage is one of the fundamental unanswered questions in this field."</i><br /><br />And that is because of the way it is being approached.<br /><br />Until it is approached from a design perspective it will remain a mystery.<br /><br />That is because the system is software controlled.<br /><br />Software only ID says exists...Joe Ghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08305194278121208230noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-27144776149555267182010-03-15T10:09:00.845-07:002010-03-15T10:09:00.845-07:00Thought:
====
Yeah, it's quite complex.
...Thought:<br /><br />====<br /> Yeah, it's quite complex.<br /><br /> So, what hypothesis do you...<br /><br /> err, um, never mind.<br />====<br /><br />The problem is not that he did not give his hypothesis, the problem is that you don't acknowledge it.Cornelius Hunterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12283098537456505707noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-75515833209365244102010-03-15T10:00:29.389-07:002010-03-15T10:00:29.389-07:00Yeah, it's quite complex.
So, what hypothesis...Yeah, it's quite complex.<br /><br />So, what hypothesis do you...<br /><br />err, um, never mind.<br /><br />The referenced Molecular Cell article can be found at...<br />http://www.cell.com/molecular-cell/abstract/S1097-2765(10)00117-6<br /><br />The original source is not freely available but, personally, I will readily agree this is evidence of complexity and organization that suggests some hereto unknown aspect of life processes.<br /><br />My hypothesis for this involves life being quantum-based.<br /><br />I suggest this hypothesis is even fairly religion neutral in that allows for God’s existence.<br /><br />For example, see my “A God Hypothesis” from a previous thread.<br /><br />http://darwins-god.blogspot.com/2010/03/evolution-creates-evolution-as-fire.html?showComment=1268512821057#c4401994234143392014Thought Provokerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08288695859490482820noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-82461531694932969032010-03-15T04:29:45.209-07:002010-03-15T04:29:45.209-07:00Blind molecules can't identify anything, let a...Blind molecules can't identify anything, let alone correct mistakes.<br /><br />To identify and correct mistakes requires knowledge.<br /><br />This knowledge is most likely in the form of a program similar to spellchecker.<br /><br />IOW it is in the software of life- DNA being part of the hardware.Joe Ghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08305194278121208230noreply@blogger.com