tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post788549525950159613..comments2024-01-23T02:32:28.567-08:00Comments on Darwin's God: This Book Review of Paul Johnson’s New Book is a Must ReadUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-14586918132231922812014-06-24T04:06:55.546-07:002014-06-24T04:06:55.546-07:00Cornelius Hunter: Agreed. It was after that were t...<b>Cornelius Hunter</b>: <i>Agreed. It was after that were the problems began. </i><br /><br />Then Scambray's consistent denigration of Darwin as a scientist misses the mark. <br />Zachrielhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16081260898264733380noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-53783055693827187142014-06-23T18:28:08.374-07:002014-06-23T18:28:08.374-07:00Z:
Darwin was rightly considered a scientist of t...Z:<br /><br /><i>Darwin was rightly considered a scientist of the first rank before he ever published Origin of Species.</i><br /><br />Agreed. It was after that were the problems began.Cornelius Hunterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12283098537456505707noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-26662883634207809102014-06-23T15:41:27.929-07:002014-06-23T15:41:27.929-07:00Terry Scambray: Omitted by Johnson is the comment ...<b>Terry Scambray</b>: <i>Omitted by Johnson is the comment by Richard Owen, the most famous scientist of his day and the man who coined the word </i>dinosaur<i>. As Owen remarked: Darwin’s seminal book, The </i>Origin of the Species<i>, “will be forgotten in 10 years.” </i><br /><br />That's funny. Anyway, <br /><br /><b>Terry Scambray</b>: <i>Though there are plenty of sputtering attempts at it, all that the book presents are the usual empty generalities about “Darwin the scientist” </i><br /><br />Darwin was rightly considered a scientist of the first rank before he ever published <i>Origin of Species</i>.<br />Zachrielhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16081260898264733380noreply@blogger.com