tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post5967857933753745129..comments2024-01-23T02:32:28.567-08:00Comments on Darwin's God: Tim Ingold’s Question For Andy Gardner Says It AllUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger12125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-12282852718057081482016-11-15T18:58:02.648-08:002016-11-15T18:58:02.648-08:00There is nothing wrong with excluding God from sci...There is nothing wrong with excluding God from science. All the sciences do it. The problem is evolution is such bad science.Peter Wadeckhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00396555091658593382noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-71009215412222042412016-11-15T04:54:32.714-08:002016-11-15T04:54:32.714-08:00Try this link and scroll down to the last paragrap...Try this link and scroll down to the last paragraph. Iy's nothing written, but rather blurted out. This is as close as I found<br /><br /><br /><a href="http://www.evolutionnews.org/2016/11/specter_of_inte103270.html" rel="nofollow">Specter of Intelligent Design Emerges at the Royal Society Meeting</a>Chaparral Earthhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00618976919417073750noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-67777872059864751352016-11-14T14:57:45.193-08:002016-11-14T14:57:45.193-08:00There is plenty of evidence for an intelligent des...There is plenty of evidence for an intelligent designer and no evidence that stochastic processes are up to the task.<br /><br />Heck you don't even know how to test the claim that stochastic processes can produce a living organism using matter, energy and emergence.Joe Ghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08305194278121208230noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-23553897571900517992016-11-14T13:45:44.326-08:002016-11-14T13:45:44.326-08:00“Not God—we’re excluding God.”
Well, if we are go...“Not God—we’re excluding God.”<br /><br />Well, if we are going to include God in this discussion which particular one should be pick. You may say it doesn't matter, but given each have vastly different creation stories and modus operandi, it surely must.<br /><br />And besides, if we really don't have any evidence for God (or a god), then I'd agree with Eva, better to exclude God. <br /><br />After all, we do that for all other sciences and it seems work quite nicely, why not biology too?<br /><br />But CH if you disagree perhaps what you really need to do is provide solid evidence for the existence of God rather than railing against evolution. If you can do that instead, then maybe we can revisit the question?TrevorDhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06650660580820963962noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-37478016571581409632016-11-14T08:34:30.739-08:002016-11-14T08:34:30.739-08:00Sorry, this concerns Eva Jablonka's quote.Sorry, this concerns Eva Jablonka's quote.velikovskyshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10957523527184649923noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-57677057431818121072016-11-14T08:09:53.070-08:002016-11-14T08:09:53.070-08:00Yours is the mind of a monkey and it is a willfull...Yours is the mind of a monkey and it is a willfully dishonest mind.<br /><br />Nice own goalJoe Ghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08305194278121208230noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-43478272744449611232016-11-14T08:08:44.468-08:002016-11-14T08:08:44.468-08:00We have already said how to test the claim that li...We have already said how to test the claim that living organisms, their systems and subsystems were intelligently designed.<br /><br />OTOH no one can tell us how to test the claim tat natural selection didit.Joe Ghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08305194278121208230noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-26555894025279265582016-11-14T06:27:27.011-08:002016-11-14T06:27:27.011-08:00Do you have a link to the context and complete com...Do you have a link to the context and complete comment? All I can find is the same brief comment in likeminded posts.Thanksvelikovskyshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10957523527184649923noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-91582294507151131662016-11-13T20:07:52.537-08:002016-11-13T20:07:52.537-08:00It i9s a decided agenda to exclude God from nature...It i9s a decided agenda to exclude God from natures origins/workings. its not just carefully being neutral about such origins.<br />these types that get into these things have a agenda. I don't mean a conspiracy but a presumption that they obey.<br />The idea of God is historic in science for origins over thousands of years.<br />So why is it now not on the table, nay, not the biggest dish on the table.<br /><br />in the end dealing with natures complexity does force a need for the origin of the complexity and right away forces human minds to the historic conclusions.<br />Its not beautifully neutral waiting for proof of god in nature.<br />Its a presumption that god will be excluded and only knock out evidence introduce a creator.<br />its failing thinking.Robert Byershttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05631863870635096770noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-82521620527857243322016-11-13T10:05:45.298-08:002016-11-13T10:05:45.298-08:00Better the honest mind of a monkey that the willfu...Better the honest mind of a monkey that the willfully dishonest mind of a Creationist.Ghostriderhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04686873801972423841noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-42425401576238145352016-11-13T09:51:47.258-08:002016-11-13T09:51:47.258-08:00Well there you go again ...
#MindOfAMonkeyWell there you go again ...<br />#MindOfAMonkeyCornelius Hunterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12283098537456505707noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-64293170695109227552016-11-13T06:58:09.650-08:002016-11-13T06:58:09.650-08:00As always you or any other ID-Creationist is free ...As always you or any other ID-Creationist is free to provide your positive scientific evidence for the design and manufacture of biological life. As you have already noted, science doesn't control the media. Yet for some unknown reason you guys can't come up with even one tiny speck of positive evidence for your hypothesis, only attack current evolutionary theory.<br /><br />You could provide your evidence here on this blog, if you had any. But you don't, do you?<br /><br />Ghostriderhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04686873801972423841noreply@blogger.com