tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post4704162545426688465..comments2024-01-23T02:32:28.567-08:00Comments on Darwin's God: Composite Multilayered Fish Armor Provides Protection Design IdeasUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-59831675249927926492011-07-01T15:17:17.769-07:002011-07-01T15:17:17.769-07:00Thorton said...
Yes, there is. It's simpl...Thorton said...<br /><br /> <i> Yes, there is. It's simple, elegant, and well supported by the evidence. </i> <br /><br />Gee then present some. All I've ever seen from any Darwiener is trivial change + a huge pile of unwarranted speculations. <br />Maybe, possibly, must have, could have, might be could have been ... <br /><br />The list of just-so stories is as long as it is fruitless and feckless.<br /><br /><i> You really should try reading the scientific literature someday.</i> <br /><br />Gee, where do you think he gets most of this stuff from?<br /><br /><i> Since no one in the scientific community says or thinks random events alone created the structure, what's your point? </i> <br /><br />Well yes they do - everywhere. They just add selection and BINGO! There you have it - 10 million+ highly complex, impossible by RM + NS life forms, fully functional and well adapted with no known predecessors.<br /><br />Also know as <b>magic</b>.<br /><br /><i> Besides your usual chumming the waters for your IDC idiot fanboys that is.</i><br /><br />Seeing as there is not a single 1st class intellect among the whole of Darwinian fundamentalism's parakeets, it is amazing Darwin still has any fans at all. <br /><br />Pretending that selection is the key to evolution is like pretending the best tool to fix a computer is a sledge hammer.Gary H.https://www.blogger.com/profile/16324820645215394691noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-41435930716616597102011-07-01T07:02:50.318-07:002011-07-01T07:02:50.318-07:00Another example of elegance and efficiency in natu...Another example of elegance and efficiency in nature. Nature provides an immense treasure trove of wonderful designs that mankind can benefit from. These are exciting times for biomimicry research.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-36125199506502643892011-06-29T20:59:04.575-07:002011-06-29T20:59:04.575-07:00Cornelius says:
The objective of structural desig...Cornelius says:<br /><br /><i>The objective of structural designs is often to meet the requirement while minimizing weight. In this case, the armor should provide protection against attacks, such as sharp teeth bites, without adding more weight than necessary to the fish.</i><br /><br />Uh-oh. Is Cornelius speculating about the goals of the Designer(s)? This is a bad thing to do, isn't it? I understand it's certainly not OK if one's using dysteleology arguments.<br /><br />How can we justify this metaphysical claim?Geoxushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00480560335679211508noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-21992444544051197872011-06-29T18:24:43.170-07:002011-06-29T18:24:43.170-07:00That is not surprising because random events don’t...<i>That is not surprising because random events don’t create exquisitely designed multi-layered nanocomposite structures. Nor do they create the manufacturing facilities required to construct such designs. Nor do they create the instructions required to create such facilities.</i> <br /><br />This is trivially true. Evolution, however, is not merely a chain of random events. <br /><br />Nice straw man, however.oleghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11644793385433232819noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-55185124711843732222011-06-29T17:43:49.230-07:002011-06-29T17:43:49.230-07:00Cornelius Hunter said...
There is, of course, no ...<i>Cornelius Hunter said...<br /><br />There is, of course, no explanation from evolutionists for such designs. </i><br /><br />Yes, there is. It's simple, elegant, and well supported by the evidence. You really should try reading the scientific literature someday.<br /><br /><i>That is not surprising because random events don’t create exquisitely designed multi-layered nanocomposite structures.</i><br /><br />Since no one in the scientific community says or thinks random events alone created the structure, what's your point? Besides your usual chumming the waters for your IDC idiot fanboys that is.Ghostriderhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04686873801972423841noreply@blogger.com