tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post4048839142978362125..comments2024-01-23T02:32:28.567-08:00Comments on Darwin's God: Here is How Evolutionists Lie to the PublicUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger362125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-20704208475534191202013-01-18T05:28:50.236-08:002013-01-18T05:28:50.236-08:00Thanks for the list of other blogs and forums. I ...Thanks for the list of other blogs and forums. I check Skeptic Ink but I’ll have to slow down, it takes too much time from me. <br /><br />One of their main bloggers John Loftus decided he will mock theists, I think specifically Christians. This way he hopes to de convert them. I think he’ll just scare moderate people away and end up preaching to the choir. <br /><br />I appreciate polite conversation with you, especially knowing you have somewhat stronger atheist view and a way of expressing it. Is there a reason you have somewhat stronger atheist view?<br /><br />Nobody in my family, friends, colleagues is interested to talk about evolution, atheism, philosophy, physics or whatever else we here get into. This and other similar blogs are special to me because there is nowhere else to talk about issues we are all interested in. I don’t know any atheists except people here.<br /><br />Funny, my little princess loves stuffed animals, too. She doesn't care much about dolls or barbies.<br />Eugenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15513772766225981430noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-47611686553599538472013-01-17T23:12:25.128-08:002013-01-17T23:12:25.128-08:00Rjob,
Second, if you have no admiration for Diog...Rjob,<br /><br /> <b>Second, if you have no admiration for Diogenes, why jump into to defend him on something you have nothing do with</b><br /><br />Uh because I didn't, I don't believe I have defended him, merely asked you why you are obsessed with him. A mere observation<br /><br /><b>Third, I never said you have an 'emotional attachment, admiration and an emotional attachment are two different things</b><br /><br />They certainly could be different, but not mutually exclusive.<br /><br /><b>No I don't know that, I see Thorton also using profanity towards Joe, Diogenes is doing his fair share with insults and calling people liars left and right and I have used a few choice names myself and If I recall you also called me a prick.. ;) </b><br /><br />I don't believe I called you a prick, that is not my style. Thorton is close to the line but Joe excells in " cuss words", which are the the issue. After all you are not shrinking violet when it comes to insult laden post as well.<br /><br /><b>Also, thanks for letting me know you find Diogenes 'intelligent', I'm sure he and his ego will be flattered. However intelligence is not the problem from where I sit..</b><br /><br />Ok,you're welcome ? Really Diogenes emotional state is irrelevant to me but again seems of great interest to you, what exactly is Diogenes problem?<br /><br /><b>I find it amusing you, Thorton and TWT jump into something you had no part of or maybe you think Diogenes cannot handle his crap on his own? Or perhaps evolution defenders can do now wrong in each other's eyes? Anyway, have to get back to my work.. Take care..</b><br /><br />I would be curious what defense of Diogenes I jumped to,asking why you were obsessed with him? The more you say the more that is obvious. He is your singular focus,not mine. In fact he seems to be going overboard in his dissection of Joe, not that Joe doesn't deserve a hard time. You take care toovelikovskyshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01825529912160289226noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-28439688802538239212013-01-17T21:44:35.692-08:002013-01-17T21:44:35.692-08:00Eugen, my traceable ancestry is from the British I...Eugen, my traceable ancestry is from the British Isles (and probably Germany too) but I live in the Pacific Northwest of the USA. The tea and crumpets were Fifi's idea but they're okay with me too. :)<br /><br />I remember a stuffed pink unicorn my daughter had when she was a child. She had many other stuffed animals too, and still has most of them. Little girls are precious. <br /><br />Yeah, I don't want to see this blog shut down to comments again either. Cornelius is pretty tolerant but some of the comments, especially by joe g, could cause Cornelius to shut down comments again, just like the last time joe g had a meltdown here. Why Cornelius puts up with him at all is beyond me. Other commenters here, including me, can be blunt, harsh, or even somewhat profane at times but joe g's lack of control is off the charts. <br /><br />If this blog gets shut down again you can always go over to Panda's Thumb or AtBC. I can't promise a warm welcome (I have no control there) but you'll be able to say what you want without fear of being blocked or banned. Skeptic Ink is a fairly new site that has a bunch of blogs that you might find interesting. The blogs there are mainly devoted to skepticism, atheism/religion, science, politics, etc., and most are pretty civil. Sandwalk is another blog that might interest you. <br /><br />If you'd like to check out some good science sites I'd recommend Deep Sea News, The Daily Galaxy, and Science Daily. The whole truthhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07219999357041824471noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-25212161666108783182013-01-17T09:13:36.840-08:002013-01-17T09:13:36.840-08:00rjop also believes I am someone called "Igor&...<b>rjop also believes I am someone called "Igor" and someone called "L Moreau", as you see in her comment above.</b> <br /><br />Nope, not in my comment above.. So you don't know them? Why are you their only friend on HP after they signed up the day Shapiro's blog posted only to talk about you and L Moreau never made a single comment about anything else, and thanks for correcting my spelling on L Moreau you seem to know it pretty well...<br /><br />http://www.huffingtonpost.com/james-a-shapiro/further-thoughts-on-the-e_b_1893984.html<br /><br /><br /><b>So you admit you were lying. You never had any evidence that I wrote anything harassing at Shapiro's blog. You just lied about it</b><br /><br />I said harassing 'behavior' not comment.. The harassing comments were on other blogs which of course you ignore and avoid taking responsibility.. Shapiro's request for you to give it a rest is very clear in the Bob Dylan link, don't blame me you're blind..<br /><br /><b>besides believing that she communes with "me" at Christian Post, where I have never commented,</b> <br /><br />That's right you have not commented as 'me' or Diogenes but have under your real name.. <br /><br />Thanks for further demonstrating you're a demented liar not to mention a complete psychopath.. rjophttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15067510053393810705noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-12828987772258761732013-01-17T05:45:30.105-08:002013-01-17T05:45:30.105-08:00TWT
Tea and crumpets? You must be British. I laugh...TWT<br />Tea and crumpets? You must be British. I laugh about Fifi because my daughter has a pink plush unicorn. <br /><br />I think Jack Nicholson will have to come back to warn everybody to get along. We don't want this blog shut down, I don't want to be a vagabond again. Eugenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15513772766225981430noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-85870825110861009422013-01-17T02:35:02.869-08:002013-01-17T02:35:02.869-08:00Note to innocent bystanders:
Our mentally unbalan...Note to innocent bystanders:<br /><br />Our mentally unbalanced commenter rjop, besides believing that she communes with "me" at Christian Post, where I have never commented,<br /><br />rjop also believes I am someone called "Igor" and someone called "L Moreau", as you see in her comment above.<br /><br />Below is ALL of rjop's evidence that I wrote the allegedly "harassing" comments she claims.<br /><br />rjop: <i>Don't blame me you are too lazy to find it in Shapiro's blog you didn't comment at.</i><br /><br />So you admit you were lying. You never had any evidence that I wrote anything harassing at Shapiro's blog. You just lied about it. <br /><br />I accept your confession.Diogeneshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15551943619872944637noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-40838012711343783032013-01-17T02:09:16.325-08:002013-01-17T02:09:16.325-08:00Yes you did harass him, so much so he asked you to...Yes you did harass him, so much so he asked you to give it a rest.. Don't blame me you are too lazy to find it in Shapiro's blog you didn't comment at. <br /><br />Come on Diopuke stop playing games, stating your going to brutal battle with Shapiro and he is terrified and your going to blog on how scared to death he is of you is harassment bordering on threats, and worse when you state it behind their back.. But to be expected from a coward psychopath such as yourself.. <br /><br /><b> but wouldn't let me respond to defend myself. That's the kind of "brutal" behavior I expect from teleologists and IDiots.</b><br /><br />No, that is your claim which is another lie. You know darn well he said he saw nothing come in from you and you were not banned and stated you have the right to respond. He posted the same type of Blog entry on John Kwok and John was not banned from replying and did so many times.. Stop with poor little me scheme.. BTW how are your buddies Igor and L Morean? rjophttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15067510053393810705noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-85588597710676320082013-01-17T01:32:54.223-08:002013-01-17T01:32:54.223-08:00Sure you could,but since I was here before you it ...<b>Sure you could,but since I was here before you it is impossible for me to have followed you here, plus I am not fixated on you alone, or constantly haranguing you. All things which you are doing. Diogenes seems very intelligent but I hardly admire him. That is an interesting comment though. Why would I have any emotional attachment for Diogenes , that is kinda telling that you think I would.</b><br /><br />First, I followed no one here, was reading the articles by Dr. Hunter as I do on a regular basis and noticed Diogenes whom I obviously have had run in's with before. <br /><br />Second, if you have no admiration for Diogenes, why jump into to defend him on something you have nothing do with?<br /><br />Third, I never said you have an 'emotional attachment, admiration and an emotional attachment are two different things.. <br /><br /><b>Perhaps you are right,mainly is more accurate, just as example on this thread Joe is only you person is using profanity, but you know that .</b><br /><br />No I don't know that, I see Thorton also using profanity towards Joe, Diogenes is doing his fair share with insults and calling people liars left and right and I have used a few choice names myself and If I recall you also called me a prick.. ;) <br /><br />Also, thanks for letting me know you find Diogenes 'intelligent', I'm sure he and his ego will be flattered. However intelligence is not the problem from where I sit... <br /><br />I find it amusing you, Thorton and TWT jump into something you had no part of or maybe you think Diogenes cannot handle his crap on his own? Or perhaps evolution defenders can do now wrong in each other's eyes? Anyway, have to get back to my work.. Take care.. rjophttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15067510053393810705noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-40863255822563126772013-01-17T01:00:57.829-08:002013-01-17T01:00:57.829-08:00Rjop accused me of harassing people at Shapiro'...Rjop accused me of harassing people at Shapiro's blog.<br /><br /><i>Not to mention your complete harassing behavior regarding evolution on his [James Shapiro's] blog and others.</i><br /><br />She is lying. I demanded that she copy and paste one of my allegedly "harassing" comments. <br /><br />So rjop provides:<br /><br />Me: <i>"I get to go to battle with Shapiro today.. It will be brutal"</i><br /><br />Totally true, I wrote that, NOT HARASSING, and <b>NOT ON SHAPIRO'S BLOG</b>. <br /><br />You told people I harassed him ON HIS BLOG.<br /><br /><i>Not to mention your complete harassing behavior regarding evolution on his [James Shapiro's] blog and others.</i><br /><br />Where is the evidence of your accusation? You could copy and paste if you had any.<br /><br />As for "brutal", I knew that Shapiro would just employ ad hominem attacks, which he did. <br /><br />Shapiro wrote an entire blog post attacking me personally, but wouldn't let me respond to defend myself. That's the kind of "brutal" behavior I expect from teleologists and IDiots.<br /><br />Security Clearance once wrote:<br /><br /><i>IT IS UP TO THEM TO SUPPORT IT.</i><br /><br />Guess what? rjop wrote:<br /><br />rjop: <i>Now you can't remember harassing Shapiro</i><br /><br />Nor can you, because it never happened. <br />You were lying.<br /><br />Copy and paste my whole allegedly "harassing" comment right here for everyone to see. Come get me. Prove that I harassed Shapiro. Prove it.<br /><br /><b>IT IS UP TO THEM TO SUPPORT IT.</b><br />Diogeneshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15551943619872944637noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-73831639946836309482013-01-17T00:12:26.229-08:002013-01-17T00:12:26.229-08:00And hey, Joe "Security Clearance" Gallie...And hey, Joe "Security Clearance" Gallien:<br /><br />You called Thorton "flacid" 20+ times before I corrected your spelling.<br /><br />Now you have called me "diarhea" 4 times. How many dozens of times will you write "diarhea" before you learn how to spell?<br /><br />If you going to use infantile scatology, at least spell it correctly.Diogeneshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15551943619872944637noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-11666770145122003592013-01-17T00:10:43.545-08:002013-01-17T00:10:43.545-08:00Nope, you are the liar, read the comments on his b...Nope, you are the liar, read the comments on his blog and other blogs you yourself linked to in another comment here blind psychopath. Are you also denying you called him a cowardly wuss, stated he was terrified of you and how you get to blog on how *scared to death he is of you? <br /><br />Does "I get to go to battle with Shapiro today.. It will be **brutal" ring any bells..? And don't bother thinking to delete them when your realization has kicked in, they have already been recorded.. rjophttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15067510053393810705noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-51688648127642122792013-01-17T00:08:40.515-08:002013-01-17T00:08:40.515-08:00Rjob,
Vel,
the blog was not shut down only beca...Rjob,<br /> <b>Vel, <br /><br />the blog was not shut down only because of Joe and his comments were not the only ones removed. </b><br /><br />Perhaps you are right,mainly is more accurate, just as example on this thread Joe is only you person is using profanity, but you know that .<br /><br /><b>I could ask the same thing on your seemingly obsession with everything I say all over this board, and your admiration of Diogenes, but I won't as that would be just a bit weird...</b><br /><br />Sure you could,but since I was here before you it is impossible for me to have followed you here, plus I am not fixated on you alone, or constantly haranguing you. All things which you are doing. Diogenes seems very intelligent but I hardly admire him. That is an interesting comment though. Why would I have any emotional attachment for Diogenes , that is kinda telling that you think I would.<br /><br />You seem to be a little overwrought, our only contact was over your use of a questionable ad hom. Ther other followed from you defend ending Joe language. Joe obliged and you had an encouraging comment underneath,as luck would have it. Beyond that to tell the truth your comments have been pretty lacking in any argument other than Diogenes is stupid. I was hoping for less heat and more substance<br /><br />I figured I would get no answer but I think I have a better idea now,thanks.velikovskyshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01825529912160289226noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-5876039950254092762013-01-16T22:17:48.765-08:002013-01-16T22:17:48.765-08:00Joe,
d#%klick:
You have evaded providing even one...<b>Joe,<br /><br />d#%klick:<br />You have evaded providing even one shred of evidence.<br /><br />LoL! You are nothing but a piece of #%it loser.<br /><br />And it is hilarious that you actually think that I have something to prove to a known a%#wipe like </b><br /><br /><br />Joe<br /><b>Your cowardly diatribe is duly noted. Take away evoTARD lies and nonsense and my comments are clean.</b><br /><br />Which diatribe? I thought you were proud you forced the cowardly Dr Hunter to shut down the comments, weren't you? I don't know ,Joe, I don't think the rule is no bad language unless you have a good reason. Why pick a fight with me,it looks like you have enough to keep you occupied. I actually find this sort of boring. But at least you have Rjob as wingman<br /><br /><b>But when you buttheads openly crap on other people you should learn to shut up and take the retaliation like a man</b><br /><br />Gee Joe , I really don't care what you say or how you say it, but since I enjoy this blog I am forced to note your lack of control.Second I don't believe I was talking to you anyway and since you show no signs of StFU yourself, itt seems a little hypocritical to demand someone else does. But I appreciate the " please"<br /><br />That said Eugen and I are interested in astronomy, is it true you have experience in that area? If you mentioned it I missed it,this thread is becoming unwieldy . Mind sharing the details? velikovskyshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01825529912160289226noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-83512163451757656702013-01-16T21:49:22.930-08:002013-01-16T21:49:22.930-08:00rjop
Why are you stalking me? I have no problem w...<i>rjop<br /><br />Why are you stalking me? I have no problem with you but it is obvious you want me too.. </i><br /><br />Oooooh! You going to stalk me now too? :)<br /><br />I take it you have no ability to present any scientific positive evidence for ID-Creationism. It's good that you know your limitations.Ghostriderhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04686873801972423841noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-67228019794567097882013-01-16T21:41:02.045-08:002013-01-16T21:41:02.045-08:00Uh oh Thorton you done woke the bearUh oh Thorton you done woke the bearvelikovskyshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01825529912160289226noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-17211169190100867812013-01-16T21:13:32.104-08:002013-01-16T21:13:32.104-08:00@rjop -
you're lying. If I had harassed Shap...@rjop - <br /><br />you're lying. If I had harassed Shapiro, you could copy and paste my whole "harassing" comment right here. You won't because you're lying about it.<br /><br /><i>Now you can't remember harassing Shapiro</i><br /><br />Nor can you, because it never happened. Copy and paste my whole allegedly "harassing" comment right here for everyone to see. Come get me. Prove that I harassed Shapiro. Prove it. <br /><br />Copy and paste my whole allegedly "harassing" comment right here, right now.<br /><br /><i>Not to mention your complete harassing behavior regarding evolution on his [James Shapiro's] blog and others.</i><br /><br />rjop is lying. Come on, come get me. If I wrote "harassing" comments there, then copy and paste them here. Come prove me wrong. Go copy and paste what you call are my "harassing" comments over there. <br /><br />Don't make accusations and sly insinuations. Come get me. Prove it. Copy and paste my allegedly "harassing" right here, right now. <br /><br />Why won't you? Oh I forgot, YOU'RE A LIAR.Diogeneshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15551943619872944637noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-59435351178801476842013-01-16T21:02:22.873-08:002013-01-16T21:02:22.873-08:00@Jeff, to continue:
Lastly we have this garbage f...@Jeff, to continue:<br /><br />Lastly we have this garbage from Jeff:<br /><br /><i>The UCA hypothesis is too conceptually general to imply anything testable (i.e., that could potentially falsify the hypothesis). And the falsification of any forthcoming naturalistic explanation of SOME UCA tree will also not falsify the UCA hypothesis.</i><br /><br />This is so contemptible it is not even worth addressing. Pure pig-ignorance of phylogenetics and nested hierarchy.<br /><br />I have read dozens of creationist books. They all lie about the fossil record in order to try to falsify evolution.<br /><br />If UCA is not falsifiable, why do creationists lie outright, in every book, in order to try to falsify it?<br /><br />They all assert there are no transitional fossils to try to falsify evolution. <br /><br />They all said, for example: where are the land-animal whale transitionals?<br /><br />Michael Behe said, where are the land animal-whale transitionals? <br /><br />Uh, in PAKISTAN you idiot. We have a full suite of transitionals for that.<br /><br />Creationists all said, where are the proto-feathers? <br /><br />Uh, in AMBER you imbeciles. We now have dinosaur proto-feathers in all four stages of Prum's gradualist evo devo model-- not just proto-feathers as imprints, but trapped in amber. Some are so finely textured we can reconstruct the colors and stripes.<br /><br />Creationists all said, where are the ape-man fossils? Uh, in OLDUVAI you morons. <br /><br />We have Lucy, Little Foot, Turkana Boy, Taung child, Australopithecus, Homo habilis, Homo erectus...<br /><br /><b>If UCA is not falsifiable, why did creationists lie outright, in every book, in order to try to falsify it?</b><br /><br />UCA predicted there would be NO chimera, no mermaid, no minotaur, no manticore, no sphinx, no centaur, no pegasus, no hippogriff, no Chinese long, no kirin, no bixi, no bixiu, no naga, no jackalope, no chupacabra. None of those exist.<br /><br />But UCA <i>did</i> predict ape-man, artiodactyl-whale, half-bat, mini-horse, proto-feathers on dinosaurs, carnivoran-seal, frogmander, half-flatfish, land animal-sirenian, bitty legged half-snakes, and on and on.<br /><br /><b>We now have EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THOSE and MORE.<br /><br />WE HAVE THE FOSSILS. WE WIN.</b><br />Diogeneshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15551943619872944637noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-90909505716477541752013-01-16T20:48:14.146-08:002013-01-16T20:48:14.146-08:00@Jeff -
you have pulled out the presuppository ag...@Jeff -<br /><br />you have pulled out the presuppository again. <br /><br />I note you have not written any proofs in the form of syllogisms, as you cannot. So there are no "logical proofs" from you, merely bare assertions.<br /><br />For example:<br /><br /><i>One can only INFER that minds are reliable once one posits the reality of illusions, apparent memories, etc. That inference is only explicable TO DATE by benevolent design. All other approaches are arbitrary because they posit reliability that is, per those approaches, inexplicable </i><br /><br />Here you are equivocating between meanings of "explicable." What does "to explain" mean?<br /><br />1. Fairy tale definition of "to explain" - allege a cause without evidence.<br /><br />2. Scientific definition of "to explain" - formulate hypothesis that is as simple as possible while emitting testable hypotheses about observable quantities.<br /> <br />Thus, when you say:<br /><br /><i>One can only INFER that minds are reliable once one posits the reality of illusions, apparent memories, etc. That inference is only explicable TO DATE by benevolent design</i><br /><br />Here you applying the fairy tale definition of "to explain", as in your allegation of a cause: <b>"invisible spook did it by magic."</b><br /><br />This fairy tale "to explain" is not the scientific "to explain" in that it does not make testable predictions about observable phenomena. <br /><br />Your allegation of cause, not truly an explanation, that "invisible spook did it by magic" can accomodate all data, all possible observations, thus predicting nothing.<br /><br />To compare this fairy tale "explanation", actually an allegation of cause, is not comparable to scientific explanations, and to compare them is either equivocation, or just apples and oranges.<br /><br />And again:<br /><br /><i>All other approaches are arbitrary because they posit reliability that is, per those approaches, inexplicable</i><br /><br />No. You have not demonstrated that "reliability" of the human mind exists all the time or consistently, and you have not demonstrated that it cannot be EXPLAINED by evolution, with EXPLANATION here in the scientific sense.<br /><br />If you apply the fairy tale sense of "to explain" which you invoked for your invisible spook, then evolution/big bang is an explanation by the same standard: it is an allegation of cause.<br /><br />If we apply the scientific sense of "to explain", then your invisible spook is no explanation, but evolution/big bang is an explanation by the scientific meaning: it emits testable predictions about observable phenomena.<br /><br />If the human mind were the product of evolution by natural selection, we can expect mind to be PARTIALLY reliable and we predict that:<br /><br />1. mind would be reliable and converge to common solutions, where ideas about testable entities are concerned, and<br /><br />2. mind would be UNreliable and produce many equally bad solutions, where ideas about UNtestable entities are concerned<br /><br />The progress of science is proof of 1.<br /><br />Religion, religious conflict and creationism are proof of 2.<br /><br />Thus, evolution by natural selection is the best EXPLANATION of partially-reliable mind, with EXPLANATION in the scientific sense.<br /><br />The fairy tale definition of "to explain", that is, to allege a cause, cannot distinguish between "invisible spook did it by magic" and germ theory, cell theory, quantum mechanics etc.<br /><br />Diogeneshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15551943619872944637noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-74886039348224289592013-01-16T20:26:30.653-08:002013-01-16T20:26:30.653-08:00Vel,
BS, the blog was not shut down only because...Vel, <br /><br />BS, the blog was not shut down only because of Joe and his comments were not the only ones removed. <br /><br /><b>Now that I have been forthcoming why the obsession with Diogenes</b><br /><br />I could ask the same thing on your seemingly obsession with everything I say all over this board, and your admiration of Diogenes, but I won't as that would be just a bit weird... rjophttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15067510053393810705noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-26528604277515588572013-01-16T20:14:30.115-08:002013-01-16T20:14:30.115-08:00Thorton:
Ignorant lying "double-naught spy&q...Thorton:<br /><br /><i>Ignorant lying <b>"double-naught spy"</b> dumbass</i><br /><br />AH HA HA HA HA HA HA.<br /><br />Remember the episode of the Beverly Hillbillies where Jethro wants to be a double-naught spy?<br /><br />And he puts a "bullet-proof shield" on their wagon, which is a bathtub, with a rope to pull it down?<br /><br />Our "security clearance" Joe G makes Jethro look like Albert Einstein.<br />Diogeneshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15551943619872944637noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-9497789352087988912013-01-16T20:11:50.041-08:002013-01-16T20:11:50.041-08:00Thorton,
, like how one night he single-handedly ...Thorton,<br /><br /><b>, like how one night he single-handedly ate 25 lbs of chocolate pudding MREs to keep them from falling into enemy hands.</b><br /><br />"Some men see things as they are and say why - I dream things that never were and say why not." velikovskyshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01825529912160289226noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-14302017883236918552013-01-16T20:11:49.576-08:002013-01-16T20:11:49.576-08:00Why do you keep stalking him?
Why are you stalkin...<b>Why do you keep stalking him?</b><br /><br />Why are you stalking me? I have no problem with you but it is obvious you want me too.. rjophttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15067510053393810705noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-40865077181955028912013-01-16T20:07:59.233-08:002013-01-16T20:07:59.233-08:00Joe "security clearance" Gallien:
Just ...Joe "security clearance" Gallien:<br /><br /><i>Just who are you, anyway? Obvioulsy just another jealous freak.</i><br /><br />Obvioulsy, I'm jealous of your spelling skills.Diogeneshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15551943619872944637noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-13157195883561450702013-01-16T20:03:33.900-08:002013-01-16T20:03:33.900-08:00What a lying moron..
http://www.huffingtonpost.co...<i>What a lying moron..<br /><br />http://www.huffingtonpost.com/james-a-shapiro/bob-dylan-encode-and-evol_b_1873935.html</i><br /><br />OK, you got me, I was wrong. I misremembered, and thought that I was arguing with Shapiro on Mike White's HuffPost blog. I forgot that I was arguing with Shapiro at one of Shapiro's HuffPost posts. <br /><br />A couple days after that, when Shapiro wrote a whole blog post attacking me personally, I tried commenting at Shapiro's blog and my comments disappeared. Since then, I haven't been back to HuffPost.<br /><br />However, you're still a lying moron.<br /><br />Rjop wrote: <i>Not to mention your complete harassing behavior regarding evolution on his [James Shapiro's] blog and others.</i><br /><br />Back that up. Copy and paste any comment I wrote at James Shapiro's blog that was "complete harassing behavior."<br /><br />Come on-- I dare you. Copy and paste a comment I wrote at James Shapiro's blog that was "complete harassing behavior."<br /><br />Where's my harassing behavior? Who did I harass? Shapiro?Diogeneshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15551943619872944637noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-90369317492107791212013-01-16T20:00:23.560-08:002013-01-16T20:00:23.560-08:00Joe,
d#%klick:
You have evaded providing even one...Joe,<br /><br /><b>d#%klick:<br />You have evaded providing even one shred of evidence.<br /><br />LoL! You are nothing but a piece of #%it loser.<br /><br />And it is hilarious that you actually think that I have something to prove to a known a%#wipe like </b><br /><br />Rjob,<br /><b><br />I've seen many of the comments here and I highly doubt it is only because of Joe's language.. Appears you are turning a blind eye to your evangelical evolutionist buddies..</b><br /><br />Still highly doubt? Or are you are turning a blind eye to your evangelical creationist new buddies? The ends justify the means? <br /><br /><br />Thank you Joe , in golf they call that ham and eggsvelikovskyshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01825529912160289226noreply@blogger.com