tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post3888651495946142782..comments2024-01-23T02:32:28.567-08:00Comments on Darwin's God: Professor B Supports EvolutionUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger82125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-45723083417295900812016-10-20T18:35:15.691-07:002016-10-20T18:35:15.691-07:00The world? LOL. You are clueless. This blog is not...The world? LOL. You are clueless. This blog is not that popular, unfortunately. Besides, what I said is true. I don't care whether or not you would want to have a drink with me, or anybody else for that matter.Rebel Sciencehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11762287159937757216noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-65013220686745785642016-10-20T16:56:44.546-07:002016-10-20T16:56:44.546-07:00If you really didn't care, you wouldn't bo...If you really didn't care, you wouldn't bother to tell the world about it.Pedanthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12656298969231453877noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-43731280276162587732016-10-20T15:54:56.570-07:002016-10-20T15:54:56.570-07:00Says the dirt worshiping closet homosexual.
ahaha...Says the dirt worshiping closet homosexual.<br /><br />ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...Rebel Sciencehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11762287159937757216noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-46628018773025291252016-10-20T14:56:14.500-07:002016-10-20T14:56:14.500-07:00"I'm happy as a clam."
And have hal..."<i>I'm happy as a clam."</i><br /><br />And have half the intelligence and personality. <br /><br />ahah ahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahah ahaha....<br /><br />That last line sounds almost as moronic when I say it as when you do. But not quite. William Spearshakehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09354659259971103985noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-88412632553973975182016-10-20T13:01:07.029-07:002016-10-20T13:01:07.029-07:00I don't care.I don't care.Rebel Sciencehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11762287159937757216noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-48748662989816090142016-10-20T12:05:43.101-07:002016-10-20T12:05:43.101-07:00You would not know a Christian if one kicked you i...You would not know a Christian if one kicked you in the ass. You are a gutless, closet homosexual with a bone to pick with Christianity. That's your only motivation. The fact that you are a member of the dirt worshiping community is proof that you are not only gutless but you are also brain dead.<br /><br />Now go eat a donut or something and see if I care. Or better, yet go pound a yam up your asteroid orifice seeing that, as a homosexual male, you enjoy these sort of things.<br /><br />ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahahaRebel Sciencehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11762287159937757216noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-38024141124921070902016-10-19T17:13:10.081-07:002016-10-19T17:13:10.081-07:00I wouldn't want to have a drink with any of yo...I wouldn't want to have a drink with any of you [Fill in the blank].Pedanthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12656298969231453877noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-56236789683350031922016-10-19T16:14:14.863-07:002016-10-19T16:14:14.863-07:00Sorry Mapou, but Nic has a spine far stronger than...Sorry Mapou, but Nic has a spine far stronger than yours. Rmb, from what I saw, is just the atheist version of you. Thankfully, they are not indicative of atheists, any more than you are indicative of Christians. <br /><br />Nic and I disagree on many things, but I think I would still enjoy sitting down and having a drink with him. You and rmg, on the other hand, don't appreciate the benefits that come from differing opinions. <br /><br />All I can say is, sucks to be you. William Spearshakehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09354659259971103985noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-39818648267338140002016-10-19T08:21:37.446-07:002016-10-19T08:21:37.446-07:00Louis,
"Nic, the spineless Christian, arguin...Louis,<br /><br />"Nic, the spineless Christian, arguing with dirt worshipers. Man, get a life."<br /><br />What happened to you to make you so angry and so unhappy? Why is it so unsettling to you when someone has a different viewpoint that you feel it's necessary to call them dirt worshippers and spineless? Really, it must be sad to have so much nastiness pent-up inside.Nichttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08693133888203943510noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-52475194249699236942016-10-18T20:36:20.221-07:002016-10-18T20:36:20.221-07:00Says the brain-dead dirt worshiper. Go suck on a r...Says the brain-dead dirt worshiper. Go suck on a rock or something. You're effing boring.Rebel Sciencehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11762287159937757216noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-31342882294687315042016-10-18T15:06:21.978-07:002016-10-18T15:06:21.978-07:00religiuos money-baggers,
"On the other hand,...religiuos money-baggers,<br /><br />"On the other hand, I do notice that ignorance and 'trying the low punches' goes no matter what kind of faith a religious nut has. I seems that it hasnt dawned on you muslims, christians, hinduists, kim-il-sung worshippers and what not - that instead of beliving the lies you'r told... maybe, juuust maybe - you should try to grow a brain :- )<br /><br />You might find that you still have some scraps left."<br /><br />What a marvelous display of evolutionary intellect and hypocrisy. One long spew of vindictive nonsense accusing others of 'low punches'. <br /><br />'Brainless Christians' just happen to be the source of the scientific method you so obviously worship. So the onus would actually be on you to grow a brain and do a little research into that fact. It's obvious you're the one believing what ever he is told without looking into the facts. Sadly, this is a condition all too common to evolutionists. <br /><br />"Funny how I dont really meet the same kind of '5year old attitude' from my fellow university graduates. I guess... its called intelligence."<br /><br />Seriously! How about PZ Meyers or Jerry Coyne? They have childishness down to an art.<br /><br />As for graduating from university being a marker of intelligence and maturity, Meyers, Coyne and your own post provide a strong argument against that belief.Nichttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08693133888203943510noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-59470183865202699902016-10-18T10:41:43.490-07:002016-10-18T10:41:43.490-07:00Man, I know that religious nuts are not intelligen...Man, I know that religious nuts are not intelligent, but I didnt realise you are that dimwittet. "dirtworshipper". <br /><br />Really? Are you 5 years old?<br /><br />What a pity you must be to your parents. I hope they remember to give you a lollipop and a pad on the head each time you meet someone who has a different oppinion than you, because clearly you cant handle that.<br /><br />Funny how I dont really meet the same kind of '5year old attitude' from my fellow university graduates. I guess... its called intelligence.<br /><br />On the other hand, I do notice that ignorance and 'trying the low punches' goes no matter what kind of faith a religious nut has. I seems that it hasnt dawned on you muslims, christians, hinduists, kim-il-sung worshippers and what not - that instead of beliving the lies you'r told... maybe, juuust maybe - you should try to grow a brain :- )<br /><br />You might find that you still have some scraps left.religious money-baggershttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10064485853607932302noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-32929761202471207302016-10-13T22:07:12.860-07:002016-10-13T22:07:12.860-07:00I thought it was a great argument. Don't blame...I thought it was a great argument. Don't blame me if you're slow. I find it ironic that a dirt worshipper is not ashamed to bash religious nuts. The jackass should look in the mirror.Rebel Sciencehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11762287159937757216noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-37591337867866686642016-10-13T19:48:53.331-07:002016-10-13T19:48:53.331-07:00Astute response Mapou. Do you have a logical count...Astute response Mapou. Do you have a logical counter argument? Or is "dirt worshipper" all you have? Btw, rhetorical question. William Spearshakehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09354659259971103985noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-4601434995105958482016-10-13T13:28:04.709-07:002016-10-13T13:28:04.709-07:00Says the dirt worshipper.Says the dirt worshipper.Rebel Sciencehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11762287159937757216noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-5634543511706451582016-10-12T10:26:39.484-07:002016-10-12T10:26:39.484-07:00How sad with these religious nuts.
There is a simp...How sad with these religious nuts.<br />There is a simple difference between science and fanatism:<br /><br />Science tries different answers constantly looking for that which at the moment fits best to our percieved reality.<br /><br />Religion, chalatans and right out nut-cases does the opposite: Uphold one answer and try to force the reality to fit it.<br /><br />You, dear blogger, should be qualified to get refunded your educational fees -in the case you even have one.religious money-baggershttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10064485853607932302noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-37111554757951672572016-09-22T18:22:07.889-07:002016-09-22T18:22:07.889-07:00Yes....and dead dogs stay dead dogs.
http://www.u...Yes....and dead dogs stay dead dogs.<br /><br />http://www.uncommondescent.com/chemistry/relevance-of-coin-analogies-to-homochirality-and-symbolic-organization-in-biology/Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-66372124325215450422016-09-22T17:07:10.033-07:002016-09-22T17:07:10.033-07:00Except for me. I was the last person yesterday.Except for me. I was the last person yesterday.Pedanthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12656298969231453877noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-69380971207286976022016-09-21T17:28:50.969-07:002016-09-21T17:28:50.969-07:00It is true.
You are the last person.It is true.<br /><br />You are the last person.Pedanthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12656298969231453877noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-89187396577886838532016-09-18T19:18:24.303-07:002016-09-18T19:18:24.303-07:00BC: "And your theory of how 44 million mutati...BC: "<i>And your theory of how 44 million mutations get fixed in the population?"</i><br /><br />First, we are not talking about 44 million different mutations being fixed in the time between the chimp/human split. Second, when you can explain why this is true, we can continue discussing this. If you can't, you really aren't worth talking with. William Spearshakehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09354659259971103985noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-84689226990440743962016-09-18T18:24:45.880-07:002016-09-18T18:24:45.880-07:00"What's to reconcile, VJT and you are und..."What's to reconcile, VJT and you are under the assumption that these 44 million mutations had to occur sequentionally in a single direct lineage. In any population, the source of mutations available is all of the mutations in a population."<br /><br />And your theory of how 44 million mutations get fixed in the population?Bill Colehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06642212549806694659noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-34752147276708265512016-09-18T07:45:33.239-07:002016-09-18T07:45:33.239-07:00" He asked a question on TSZ if anyone could ..."<i> He asked a question on TSZ if anyone could reconcile the 44 million mutational differences between chimps and man. There were no takers."</i><br /><br />What's to reconcile, VJT and you are under the assumption that these 44 million mutations had to occur sequentionally in a single direct lineage. In any population, the source of mutations available is all of the mutations in a population. William Spearshakehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09354659259971103985noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-86863163069372292452016-09-17T15:18:12.871-07:002016-09-17T15:18:12.871-07:00Joe G
I agree with you here. I think Vincent is a...Joe G<br />I agree with you here. I think Vincent is an interesting thinker and writer but he gets spun by faulty evolutionary arguments like UCD. I do see him learning, however. He asked a question on TSZ if anyone could reconcile the 44 million mutational differences between chimps and man. There were no takers.Bill Colehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06642212549806694659noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-20105312434326759472016-09-16T08:50:05.840-07:002016-09-16T08:50:05.840-07:00Torley isn't a scientist and there aren't ...Torley isn't a scientist and there aren't any fatal flaws in Axe's ID work.Joe Ghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08305194278121208230noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-33116619501024017762016-09-12T22:17:52.753-07:002016-09-12T22:17:52.753-07:00William,
"A later translation said that she ...William,<br /><br />"A later translation said that she was a virgin, which initiated the entire dogma about Mary being a virgin. But you stated above that when errors in translation are identified, that they are corrected. Translating "young woman" into "virgin" is obviously an error."<br /><br />The truth is a little more complicated than that. In Isaiah 7:14 the Hebrew word almah is translated into English as virgin when it can also mean young woman. The reason behind the word almah being rendered as virgin is due to the fact that in the 3rd century BC when the Old Testament was translated into Greek the translators used the specific Greek word for virgin, parthenos, rather than the more generic term gynaika which can mean young woman.<br /><br />If ancient Hebrew scholars chose to translate almah as 'virgin' and not 'young woman', deference must be given to them as they were much more aware of the hermeneutical demands of their day than we are.<br /><br />So no, using virgin instead of young woman predates the New Testament by several centuries and is not a later attempt to alter the meaning of the text. It most certainly is NOT an error.Nichttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08693133888203943510noreply@blogger.com