tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post308626967733717422..comments2024-01-23T02:32:28.567-08:00Comments on Darwin's God: These New Studies Demonstrating Acquired Inheritance Don’t Even Give the Secret HandshakeUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger27125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-47191711847248577892012-06-02T02:00:14.404-07:002012-06-02T02:00:14.404-07:00Yes, it is strange. Hunter does seem to ignore mo...Yes, it is strange. Hunter does seem to ignore most of the challenging questions put to him.Elizabeth Liddlehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02465414316063910821noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-38477090043791120822012-06-02T01:59:03.077-07:002012-06-02T01:59:03.077-07:00Cornelius, when you talk about "evolution&quo...Cornelius, when you talk about "evolution", do you mean "the state of knowledge that biologists had several decades ago"?<br /><br />If so, sure, evolution is dead. It dies every day. And the people who kill it are <i>evolutionists</i>.<br /><br />You think that it was anti-evolutionists who discovered epigenetics?<br /><br /><br /><a href="http://videolectures.net/eccs07_noble_psb" rel="nofollow">Here</a> is an interesting evolutionist on neo-Lamarkism.Elizabeth Liddlehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02465414316063910821noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-16532502634588345862012-06-02T01:50:57.173-07:002012-06-02T01:50:57.173-07:00Yes, I'm still waiting for that, too.Yes, I'm still waiting for that, too.Elizabeth Liddlehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02465414316063910821noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-21059673370224346152012-06-01T05:09:08.090-07:002012-06-01T05:09:08.090-07:00DaleFlannery
Perhaps it is worth whatever he is p...<i>DaleFlannery<br /><br />Perhaps it is worth whatever he is paid to comment? Thorton ... is commenting here part of your job?</i><br /><br />Correcting the disingenuous, underhanded attacks on science and honest scientists by political hacks should be everybody's job. Promoting scientific literacy over Creationist politically motivated lies is a worthwhile endeavor in my opinion. Somebody has to stand up to the liars. <br /><br />I notice that just like all the rest of the IDCers you can't / won't defend Hunter's over-the-top anti-science rhetoric. So much for you wanting to talk about the actual issues.Ghostriderhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04686873801972423841noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-64414491083463560132012-06-01T04:27:12.225-07:002012-06-01T04:27:12.225-07:00Neal Tedford: Hi Zachriel, what about the Statisti...<b>Neal Tedford</b>: <i>Hi Zachriel, what about the Statistics? Waiting on your numbers from the last article. </i><br /><br /><a href="http://darwins-god.blogspot.com/2012/05/evolutionary-tree-failed-but.html?showComment=1338475496570#c4905916803651301180" rel="nofollow">Here.</a>Zachrielhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11268229653808829377noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-41005463516110440982012-06-01T04:18:57.603-07:002012-06-01T04:18:57.603-07:00The point is that Darwin's theory of Pangenesi...The point is that Darwin's theory of Pangenesis is consistent with Darwin's Theory of Evolution. <br /><br />Heh. Here it is, almost a century and a half later, and Cornelius Hunter is touting the theory on his blog as if it was brand new. Pretty smart, that Darwin fellow.Zachrielhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11268229653808829377noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-67054784295735230282012-05-31T23:26:53.256-07:002012-05-31T23:26:53.256-07:00Thorton does seem to spend a lot more time on this...Thorton does seem to spend a lot more time on this blog than even Hunter. Strange, to say the least.Rebel Sciencehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11762287159937757216noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-74329285594939316792012-05-31T23:22:21.816-07:002012-05-31T23:22:21.816-07:00Perhaps it is worth whatever he is paid to comment...Perhaps it is worth whatever he is paid to comment? Thorton ... is commenting here part of your job?DaleFlanneryhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06365852028991103304noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-39711108387405165002012-05-31T22:59:15.826-07:002012-05-31T22:59:15.826-07:00Thorton:
Merely referring to the stuff he pushes ...Thorton:<br /><br /><i>Merely referring to the stuff he pushes here as anti-science propaganda is about the politest thing that can be said about it.</i><br /><br />Your opinion is worth more than spit, how?Rebel Sciencehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11762287159937757216noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-14289830982559682172012-05-31T22:01:09.015-07:002012-05-31T22:01:09.015-07:00DaleFlannery
Thorton:
I see that Dr. Hunter is d...<i>DaleFlannery<br /><br />Thorton:<br /><br />I see that Dr. Hunter is described as "writing anti-science propaganda pieces for a religiously driven ultra-right-wing political organisation" (or similar assertions) so frequently on this blog that I suspect that the accusers is paid (either in money, favours or recognition) to make that complaint.</i><br /><br />According to their web site Dr. Hunter is a paid Fellow of the Discovery Institute. If they have it wrong he should correct them and ask them to take it down. Merely referring to the stuff he pushes here as anti-science propaganda is about the politest thing that can be said about it.<br /><br /><i>Could we please talk about the actual issues raised rather than attacking his character. </i><br /><br />I'd love to. Problem is, there hasn't been a single Intelligent Design Creationist come through here willing to defend this dishonest dreck. CH won't even defend it himself. He chums the waters with this offal, then waits for his spittle flying Creationist groupies to chime in while CH runs for the back door.<br /><br />Epigenetic mechanisms have been known to evolutionary science for decades. Why don't you start by explaining how these findings somehow cast doubt on the whole theory. Then you can give me the IDC explanation for the observed results. Be sure to present your positive evidence for any assertions you make.Ghostriderhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04686873801972423841noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-10511015352336513052012-05-31T21:42:45.478-07:002012-05-31T21:42:45.478-07:00Jared Jammer
Let me get this straight...
Oops! T...<i>Jared Jammer<br /><br />Let me get this straight...</i><br /><br />Oops! Too late, you screwed it up already. Maybe if you bothered to read the paper and what I actually pointed out instead of just jamming your head where it doesn't belong you wouldn't appear so ignorant. It's probably too dark in there for you to make out the words anyway.Ghostriderhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04686873801972423841noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-48643789884694565722012-05-31T21:32:48.859-07:002012-05-31T21:32:48.859-07:00Thorton:
I see that Dr. Hunter is described as &q...Thorton:<br /><br />I see that Dr. Hunter is described as "writing anti-science propaganda pieces for a religiously driven ultra-right-wing political organisation" (or similar assertions) so frequently on this blog that I suspect that the accusers is paid (either in money, favours or recognition) to make that complaint.<br /><br />Which means that they themselves are "writing anti-science propaganda pieces for a religiously driven ultra-left?-wing political organisation".<br /><br />Pot, meet kettle. Could we please talk about the actual issues raised rather than attacking his character. (Unless that is the best chance you have to win the argument)DaleFlanneryhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06365852028991103304noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-40393324251626012012-05-31T21:31:58.493-07:002012-05-31T21:31:58.493-07:00Let me get this straight...
Thornton believes tha...Let me get this straight...<br /><br />Thornton believes that, because a mechanism has been proposed, that said proposed mechanism prevents this finding from qualifying as Lamarckian evolution?<br /><br />How does that follow, exactly?<br /><br />Thornton, you have to be aware at some level of just how ridiculous these nonsensical posts of yours make you look, right?<br /><br />I don't think this whole "science" thing is for you, Thornton. It's too confusing; your simpleton mind can't grasp it. I'd recommend you get yourself a See 'n Say and maybe a nice Spider-Man coloring book. Those items are more befitting your, shall we say, arrested development.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11077625716758094282noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-56072608797486276172012-05-31T18:54:49.056-07:002012-05-31T18:54:49.056-07:00Sounds like Darwin's theory of Pangenesis.
Da...<i>Sounds like Darwin's theory of Pangenesis.</i><br /><br />Darwin had a theory, therefore evolution did it. Yeah, sure. I got you.Rebel Sciencehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11762287159937757216noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-35027657943232812642012-05-31T18:43:50.754-07:002012-05-31T18:43:50.754-07:00The lady doth protest too much, methinks.The lady doth protest too much, methinks.Rebel Sciencehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11762287159937757216noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-80532931604252844602012-05-31T18:41:27.476-07:002012-05-31T18:41:27.476-07:00hahahahaha... You mockers. I love it.hahahahaha... You mockers. I love it.Rebel Sciencehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11762287159937757216noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-8507221059436225402012-05-31T17:46:51.639-07:002012-05-31T17:46:51.639-07:00Ignorant Creationist
Hi Zachriel, what about the ...<i>Ignorant Creationist<br /><br />Hi Zachriel, what about the Statistics? Waiting on your numbers from the last article.</i><br /><br />Looks like the ignorant Creationist was too lazy to look at the studies I provided with plenty of statistics and numbers.<br /><br />Isn't it funny he's got plenty of energy to bluster and bellow, but can't lift a single pudgy finger to do any reading and help himself?<br /><br />There's no cure for terminal willful ignorance.Ghostriderhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04686873801972423841noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-36831832479765803142012-05-31T17:38:43.029-07:002012-05-31T17:38:43.029-07:00It seems like every time we read a new scientific ...It seems like every time we read a new scientific discovery, it pokes more holes in the sieve known as darwinism.National Velourhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15142359587875219081noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-71169268746381066672012-05-31T17:37:25.690-07:002012-05-31T17:37:25.690-07:00Hi Zachriel, what about the Statistics? Waiting o...Hi Zachriel, what about the Statistics? Waiting on your numbers from the last article.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-84576068246911383952012-05-31T16:43:26.499-07:002012-05-31T16:43:26.499-07:00"Truth is treason in the empire of lies."..."Truth is treason in the empire of lies."-<br />Ron Paulbornagain77https://www.blogger.com/profile/16666666037080692370noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-20606180693457914722012-05-31T16:30:30.178-07:002012-05-31T16:30:30.178-07:00Forsooth, 'tis not anti science, thou equivoca...Forsooth, 'tis not anti science, thou equivocator! Rather, exposing the cult of evolutionism, even in the face of its fundamentalists, is a work of truth.Bob Sorensenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00800047570447946018noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-79004761895948074582012-05-31T15:57:53.277-07:002012-05-31T15:57:53.277-07:00"Taking a closer look at the mechanisms of in..."Taking a closer look at the mechanisms of inheritance, Darwin proposed gemmules that diffuse through the plant from the leaves to a developing seed."<br /><br />Sounds like Darwin's theory of Pangenesis.Zachrielhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11268229653808829377noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-8398130849464735972012-05-31T14:35:47.004-07:002012-05-31T14:35:47.004-07:00Jeremy Lin and Landry Fields "Secret" Ha...Jeremy Lin and Landry Fields "Secret" Handshake - video<br />http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K7wxAaf0DAcbornagain77https://www.blogger.com/profile/16666666037080692370noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-53938419814873812742012-05-31T14:19:20.767-07:002012-05-31T14:19:20.767-07:00It beats debasing yourself by writing anti-science...It beats debasing yourself by writing anti-science propaganda pieces for a religiously driven ultra-right-wing political organization.Ghostriderhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04686873801972423841noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-83417337432655596522012-05-31T14:08:06.208-07:002012-05-31T14:08:06.208-07:00"the evolutionary mechanism is given in the v..."the evolutionary mechanism is given in the very second sentence of the article:"<br /><br />OMG, what a forehead slapper. I completely forgot that evolution created everything so everything is an evolutionary mechanism. Wow. That's why you guys get the big bucks, you sure deserve it!Cornelius Hunterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12283098537456505707noreply@blogger.com