tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post2944038364462707287..comments2024-01-23T02:32:28.567-08:00Comments on Darwin's God: Complex Plant Defense StrategiesUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-38276416431530837562009-09-23T09:10:21.724-07:002009-09-23T09:10:21.724-07:00The main predicition of ID is that organisms will ...The main predicition of ID is that organisms will look the they were designed, which is certainly the case. Why do they say that ID has produced no predictions?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-46157842698077269712009-09-21T12:47:00.054-07:002009-09-21T12:47:00.054-07:00No, I do not know Dennis, but I certainly do not r...No, I do not know Dennis, but I certainly do not require infinite mechanistic detail for evolution any more than I would for geocentrism. It is a gross misrepresentation of science to say that is the main problem with evolution.Cornelius Hunterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12283098537456505707noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-88499925243554382132009-09-21T12:26:39.467-07:002009-09-21T12:26:39.467-07:00Do you know Dennis Venema? He works at Trinity Wes...Do you know Dennis Venema? He works at Trinity Western University - http://www.twu.ca/academics/science/biology/faculty/venema/ - and he has a good series of lectures at http://www.blog.beyondthefirmament.com/video-presentations/christianity-biology/<br />I bring him up as this essay in particular, and your blog in general, remind me of something he once said. He described his views on Intelligent Design as "Deny the validity of evolution pending infinite mechanistic detail; affirm the validity of ID without providing a mechanism (or testable predictions, evidence, etc)."<br /><br />http://www.calvin.edu/archive/asa/200907/0103.htmlAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com