tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post5982845003703653167..comments2024-01-23T02:32:28.567-08:00Comments on Darwin's God: The Brittlestar’s Distributed and Multifunctional Vision SystemUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-59985292590119056012014-01-31T09:58:05.251-08:002014-01-31T09:58:05.251-08:00Just what would you expect to flow from our langua...<i>Just what would you expect to flow from our language if it was due to unguided processes?</i><br /><br />I would expect what I have actually noticed all of my adult life. That scientists and journalists have been 'front-loading' phrases such as "have evolved" , "has evolved" "evolved" into every niok and cranny of every written piece on living things. That Instead of just writing 'is characterized by' or 'features' or 'contains' or 'has a remarkable ability'.<br /><br />Yes there has been a monumental effort by darwinists for many decades to push our language into an anti-design contextual framework but sometimes it all breaks down into absurdity. MSEEhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05482232168982031574noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-59758744199633060502014-01-30T04:35:09.181-08:002014-01-30T04:35:09.181-08:00Ian, I don't expect anything but disease and f...Ian, I don't expect anything but disease and functional failures from unguided evolution. And seeing that YOU cannot design any better does that make you less than a turtle's egg?<br /><br />It must. Nice job.Joe Ghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08305194278121208230noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-14216188089087897172014-01-29T16:58:08.336-08:002014-01-29T16:58:08.336-08:00Joe G January 29, 2014 at 4:25 AM
So we are too s...<i><b>Joe G</b> January 29, 2014 at 4:25 AM<br />So we are too stupid to evolve the proper language? You would think that if our existence was due ti unguided processes that would just flow from our laguage.</i><br /><br />Just what would you expect to flow from our language if it was due to unguided processes?<br /><br /><i>It's as if we were really designed by a designer...</i><br /><br />If we were, it looks like the work of a curate's egg of a designer.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11311738457332907931noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-8602173389140604272014-01-29T04:25:41.389-08:002014-01-29T04:25:41.389-08:00So we are too stupid to evolve the proper language...So we are too stupid to evolve the proper language? You would think that if our existence was due ti unguided processes that would just flow from our laguage.<br /><br />It's as if we were really designed by a designer...Joe Ghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08305194278121208230noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-44219395630637095032014-01-26T13:13:51.542-08:002014-01-26T13:13:51.542-08:00The Intelligent Designer is a DUCK? That certainl...The Intelligent Designer is a DUCK? That certainly has the merit of novelty.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11311738457332907931noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-43671987687419104392014-01-25T17:34:19.541-08:002014-01-25T17:34:19.541-08:00If it looks like a duck....etc..If it looks like a duck....etc..Glenn Jhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05974895763468680337noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-92195945503103369812014-01-25T13:54:03.103-08:002014-01-25T13:54:03.103-08:00Designed? Optimized?
That's right. Try and d...<i>Designed? Optimized?</i><br /><br />That's right. Try and describe these phenomena <i>without</i> employing teleological terminology. We are social animals so it's hardly surprising that our languages have evolved to describe the world around us in terms of intelligent agency. That is what we are dealing with most often. It doesn't mean we are all believers in Intelligent Design, however.<br /><br />Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11311738457332907931noreply@blogger.com