tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post5501032192940284926..comments2024-01-23T02:32:28.567-08:00Comments on Darwin's God: Evolutionists Now Want to Take Over PhysicsUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-1947038713783950972012-03-11T19:45:36.419-07:002012-03-11T19:45:36.419-07:00quoting the author "And given our broad under...quoting the author "And given our broad understanding of the Darwinian phase, that understanding could be immediately applied to the poorly understood earlier chemical phase. But are there reasonable grounds for such a sweeping proposal? We believe recent developments in systems chemistry. Recent work on molecular replicating systems has revealed that several phenomena associated with the answer to be yes, and base this view on replicating chemical systems are also manifest in biological systems".<br />He believes that Darwinian selection can be applied to the primordial soup? Who are the referres of this paper? <br />Well, molecules which were not apt, died and only the molecules with the correct qualities grew!!<br />The chemical world is governed by thermodynamics: enthalpy and entropy, and both point to the same direction: carbon to CO2 and hydrogen to H2O.<br />Also, the results with replicating systems (mainly Rebek) do not give hope for replication in large scale and low concentrations. The replicator had a large amount of information and were chemically activated, conditions not reliable to water systems, which react with chemically activated species and prevent aggregation by hydrogen bonding.<br />This paper is not a good ground for further theoretical or practical developments.Márcio Lazzarottohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11020926346186509332noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-61383243364234016182012-03-10T11:14:03.397-08:002012-03-10T11:14:03.397-08:00CH: Laplace, Buffon, Kant, Leibniz, Burnett and sc...CH: Laplace, Buffon, Kant, Leibniz, Burnett and scores of others Enlightened thinkers were applying Darwinian theory to the inanimate world long before Pross and, for that matter, long before Darwin.<br /><br />"Laplace, Buffon, Kant, Leibniz, Burnett and scores of others" were applying conjecture and refutation? <br /><br />Why don't you enlighten us with examples of such application?Scotthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11193595678064010528noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-61025386224769009762012-03-10T10:16:32.811-08:002012-03-10T10:16:32.811-08:00Actually, the EAC wants to take over the world.
...Actually, the EAC wants to take over the world. <br /><br />And then the galaxy.<br /><br />Perhaps I shouldn't have said that.<br /><br />What's that black helicopter doing on my roof?Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11311738457332907931noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-37774796423571898312012-03-10T02:25:04.667-08:002012-03-10T02:25:04.667-08:00Laplace, Buffon, Kant, Leibniz, Burnett and scores...<i>Laplace, Buffon, Kant, Leibniz, Burnett and scores of others Enlightened thinkers were applying Darwinian theory to the inanimate world long before Pross and, for that matter, long before Darwin.</i><br /><br />Clairvoyant were they? Educate us. Support your claim with evidence. Show how each of those eminences applied the principles of descent with modification and selection by the environment to the inanimate world. Demonstrate the sheer <b>inanity</b> of their evolutionary thoughts.Pedanthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12656298969231453877noreply@blogger.com