tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post4684887019130337990..comments2024-01-23T02:32:28.567-08:00Comments on Darwin's God: Scientific Illiteracy Growing WorseUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-76596301325014591902016-08-28T12:41:47.461-07:002016-08-28T12:41:47.461-07:00There is no scientific evidence supporting evoluti...There is no scientific evidence supporting evolutionAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03360556799084354791noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-82622207586753941002013-12-22T17:45:58.195-08:002013-12-22T17:45:58.195-08:00There is no theory for which anyone can count the ...There is no theory for which anyone can count the total number of necessary a-plausible hypotheses to IMPLY the lineages or the morphological/phenotypical change per time-frame ratio entailed in any UCA tree.That number would be mind-bogglingly huge. Never mind the number of a-plausible geological/taphonomic hypotheses one would have to make to reconcile the lineages with known stratigraphic ranges and the absence of discovered intermediates. Inductive criteria applies to ACTUAL explanations, not hunches or personal credulity.Jeffhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16852362499722076519noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-14330386846279990322013-12-22T16:28:56.277-08:002013-12-22T16:28:56.277-08:00The theory of evolution is not about origins, spon...The theory of evolution is not about origins, spontaneous or otherwise. If it has made these very modest gains in popular belief, perhaps it is because people are coming to understand that in spite of sustained efforts to mislead them.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11311738457332907931noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-25577734385542932172013-12-22T16:04:15.783-08:002013-12-22T16:04:15.783-08:00We don't know what it means. Think of how many...We don't know what it means. Think of how many people in the world blindly accept authority. When the authority changes what they dogmatically emphasize, so do the fideists change what they believe. There is no inductive evidence for UCA, naturalistic or otherwise.Jeffhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16852362499722076519noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-82217866395906675152013-12-22T15:28:15.607-08:002013-12-22T15:28:15.607-08:00Red flag? "Because the sample is based on tho...Red flag? "Because the sample is based on those who agreed to participate in the Harris Interactive panel, no estimates of theoretical sampling error can be calculated. "bornagain77https://www.blogger.com/profile/16666666037080692370noreply@blogger.com