tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post2915716531399031143..comments2024-01-23T02:32:28.567-08:00Comments on Darwin's God: Leyden and Teixeira: Political “Civil War” Coming Because of Global WarmingUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-8653902354959301822018-04-18T15:20:00.766-07:002018-04-18T15:20:00.766-07:00Pollution, yes. But CO2 is not a pollutant anymore...Pollution, yes. But CO2 is not a pollutant anymore than water vapor is.Joe Ghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08305194278121208230noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-72268623532017402352018-04-16T07:55:15.813-07:002018-04-16T07:55:15.813-07:00"I think Delhi is a myth and anyways wouldn&#...<br />"I think Delhi is a myth and anyways wouldn't just be there if true. "<br /><br />Tell that to the people that live there. Tell them it's all in their minds. Seriously? Have you ever been to a highly polluted city? But if Robert says it's a myth then it must be true.<br /><br />https://www.vox.com/energy-and-environment/2017/11/22/16666808/india-air-pollution-new-delhiTrevorDhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06650660580820963962noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-33027179813395138042018-04-15T16:21:57.881-07:002018-04-15T16:21:57.881-07:00What is greenhouse gas/ It means nothing.
CO2 is ...<i>What is greenhouse gas/ It means nothing.</i><br /><br />CO2 is a greenhouse gas. Greenhouse gases cause global warming. Civilization produces CO2. Therefore AGW is true. Does that clear it up?Cornelius Hunterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12283098537456505707noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-50393606081158013662018-04-15T16:07:15.491-07:002018-04-15T16:07:15.491-07:00I think Delhi is a myth and anyways wouldn't j...I think Delhi is a myth and anyways wouldn't just be there if true. Acid rain?? thats old news and over.<br />yes its about adding over nature but we don't do squat to nature. its a myth.<br />What is greenhouse gas/ It means nothing. there is no greenhouse effect that been proven. CO2 therefore is irrelevant.<br />I say global warming has really been fueled by a upper class establishment in order to make a cleaner greener planet. they suspect, sincerely, mans emissions hurt the planet and this deceives their investigation which is by very few people.<br />We are not getting warmer in canada.<br />Robert Byershttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05631863870635096770noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-11499807417168824522018-04-14T10:34:32.713-07:002018-04-14T10:34:32.713-07:00it’s climate change, not global warming anymore.
T...<i>it’s climate change, not global warming anymore.</i><br />The reason for the two terms is that they are not the same thing. Global warming is the observation. Climate change is the consequence. <br /><br />We know that CO2 (and methane and others) is a greenhouse gas. We know that CO2 has been increasing in the atmosphere. We know that most of this increase is due to the burning of fossil fuel. <br /><br />The environment has repeatedly shown us that when we add something to the environment above nature’s ability to easily remove it without other consequences, it seldom is beneficial to humans. And that is what we are talking about. The biosphere will survive reagardless of how much CO2 we pump into the atmosphere. Humanity may not. <br /><br />Acid rain, lake eutrophication, higher rates of lung disease in places like Delhi are all the result of indiscriminate discharge of compounds into the environment. William Spearshakehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09354659259971103985noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-43561162678300130552018-04-13T21:20:12.178-07:002018-04-13T21:20:12.178-07:00The civil war was not about a farm/slave versus jo...The civil war was not about a farm/slave versus jobs in building two cultures. It was about two separate people/civilizations in a a mutual boundary that had a moral disagreement and one party decided to change the boundaries and the other said no you can't. It was about America stopping a invasion of their territory as general grant said. every Canadian knows that.<br />Anyways.<br />Its not the scientific community. The community , be definition, has no speciality in subjects separate from the subjects they do. The whole point of science is to be a expert using expert methodology in drawing conclusions. its impossible scientists have any credibility in subjects other then their own. In fact more then regular people they have no right to say what they think about other subjects if using the title of scientist.<br />its only small numbers of "scientists" that get paid 9-5 to do climate science.<br />How many is that? who is paying them? it might just be hundreds or thousands at most.<br />so common errors easily linger.<br />yet the great point in global warming is how to p[rove its warming and if so how??<br />True or not it could only be raw data!<br />Its a great globe and seeing invisible things change the weather is very difficult. <br />since its a contention then they must prove it on the merits and not on the claim of SCIENCE CONSENSUS. <br />Thats not proving it. if they think its true show why!!<br />I say its not true and clearly poorly done.<br />I'm canadian and know many polar bears. A majority, a high one, say its not evidenced in their homes.<br />The minority are younger ones influenced by the media.Robert Byershttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05631863870635096770noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-50390730222691114592018-04-13T07:47:00.689-07:002018-04-13T07:47:00.689-07:00I don’t think the article is stating that the “civ...I don’t think the article is stating that the “civil war” is primarily because of AGW. The article talks also about “two cultures” and “two classes” also being drivers - particularly the economic divide - perhaps even bigger drivers. And of course the collapse of the Repubican party in California too is playing into this. <br /><br />Climate change may be a factor, perhaps even a big one, but is not the only one. It is more multi-faceted and complex than the OP would have us believe (things usually are). TrevorDhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06650660580820963962noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-13283715282659458472018-04-13T05:52:29.535-07:002018-04-13T05:52:29.535-07:00I heard an interview with Teixeira this morning on...I heard an interview with Teixeira this morning on NPR. It was a 5 minute interview, so short and to the point. It focused entirely on politics and his suggestion that the nation will follow the pattern seen in California. Climate change didn't come up at all. If interested, here is a link to the audio:<br />https://www.npr.org/2018/04/13/602090970/look-to-california-for-the-future-of-politics-demographer-saysAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14818404010710070781noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-56559073724605970022018-04-12T16:26:02.163-07:002018-04-12T16:26:02.163-07:00As far as emulating California, let's not.
&q...As far as emulating California, let's not.<br /><br />"Why is liberal California the poverty capital of America?"<br /><br />http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-jackson-california-poverty-20180114-story.htmlJstanley01https://www.blogger.com/profile/06146492446099633195noreply@blogger.com