tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post2553194358649634290..comments2024-01-23T02:32:28.567-08:00Comments on Darwin's God: This Circadian Clock Protein is Finely-Tuned (and a Bunch of Other Things)Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger204125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-6362821682934445452013-04-18T23:39:06.733-07:002013-04-18T23:39:06.733-07:00mother of bride dresses Love, only to be thrown ...<a href="http://www.honeybuy.com/c/Mother-Of-The-Bride-Dresses" rel="nofollow"><strong>mother of bride dresses</strong></a> Love, only to be thrown into the abyss of desire! But, gentle parting tolerance, I ask a few people can do?kucLIhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12703220428802222077noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-78202185642317451392013-03-02T14:39:07.225-08:002013-03-02T14:39:07.225-08:00Good on you, mate. Wait, wrong continent.
Giddy u...Good on you, mate. Wait, wrong continent.<br /><br />Giddy up!<br /><br />Just kidding. All the best Velik, I'll have beer on this side to celebrate.Eugenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15513772766225981430noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-53481211437277616742013-03-02T11:15:00.217-08:002013-03-02T11:15:00.217-08:00Happy Texas Indepence Day, Eugen. Celebrate with a...Happy Texas Indepence Day, Eugen. Celebrate with a Lone Star beer and a plate of enchiladas.yehawvelikovskyshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01825529912160289226noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-27950686021993599922013-02-28T07:19:52.008-08:002013-02-28T07:19:52.008-08:00Blackout tonight
You are welcome, Thorton.
:D<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=REZwgTRTN2U" rel="nofollow">Blackout tonight</a> <br /><br />You are welcome, Thorton.<br /><br />:DEugenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15513772766225981430noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-22318426259960575312013-02-28T06:43:04.396-08:002013-02-28T06:43:04.396-08:00Last Fundy out please turn off the lights.Last Fundy out please turn off the lights.Ghostriderhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04686873801972423841noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-6625037307510929292013-02-26T11:33:05.703-08:002013-02-26T11:33:05.703-08:00elijah illiterately vomited:
"and theres no ...elijah illiterately vomited:<br /><br />"and theres no "allegedly" you completely blew the meaning of providence. We both know that. Like Thornton you will lie on a dime to save face."<br /><br />I didn't make any statement about the meaning of "providence" or "provenance". I asked you questions and included the word "provenance" because you used that word. The whole truthhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07219999357041824471noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-56274059589204867392013-02-26T09:06:36.939-08:002013-02-26T09:06:36.939-08:00Elijah,
Well like I said your reading is as spotty...<b>Elijah,<br />Well like I said your reading is as spotty as your logic. Everything said in regard to provenance WAS ABOUT Thorton's argument so once again thank your for the meaningless out of context tangential comment that informed no one of anything new.</b><br /><br />Ouch, perhaps " dating the providence of a rock is not synonymous with a rock's age." threw me. <br /><br />Synonymous def.. : having the same connotations, implications, or reference .<br /><br />Again my point remains, your statement is inaccurate, dating the provenance of a sedimentary level gives its age, the upper limits of that age of the layer.Since layers are dated in ranges not absolute ages, the provenance dates the layer.<br /><br />In fairness , dating the provenance is not the exclusive means of dating a layer of sedimentary rock but one of many.Now if that is what you meant by synonymous,exclusive,I apologize <br /><br />Sorry, if that is not on the topic of your reluctance to answer the question " if you disagree with geology's present theory ,how do you explain the feature."Given your apparent modus operandi that seemed a pointless endeavor.<br /><br /><b>Thank you but based on the kindness I have seen you extend I must give you due credit for setting the bar low enough that anyone could exceed it.</b><br /><br />That is a snappy retort, failing only because it lacks a factual basis. Perhaps your assumptions of my motivations and beliefs has colored your perception. Seeing slights when none intended. <br /><br />velikovskyshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01825529912160289226noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-15835860694121044892013-02-26T07:05:21.954-08:002013-02-26T07:05:21.954-08:00This comment has been removed by the author.velikovskyshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01825529912160289226noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-57660521775277737192013-02-26T06:17:55.017-08:002013-02-26T06:17:55.017-08:00Elijah2012
I'll be able to return in a few da...<i>Elijah2012<br /><br />I'll be able to return in a few days.</i><br /><br />Don't bother until you grow a pair and come back with your Creationist explanation for the formation of angular unconformities, as well as explaining your method for properly dating geologic formations. Which of course you'll never do. Creationist dumbass.<br /><br />Ghostriderhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04686873801972423841noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-60041695873132170182013-02-26T06:07:54.300-08:002013-02-26T06:07:54.300-08:00provenance
late night and wrote Providence by mi...provenance<br /><br /><br />late night and wrote Providence by mistake. referred to provenance many times. Thats your best come back point? LOl. Kiddies, At any rate given your past I would say its a save bet you understand neither<br /><br />and theres no "allegedly" you completely blew the meaning of providence. We both know that. Like Thornton you will lie on a dime to save face.Elijah2012https://www.blogger.com/profile/02729894330690030276noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-58519582670639396022013-02-25T23:38:29.426-08:002013-02-25T23:38:29.426-08:00elijah, is it "provenance" or "PROV...elijah, is it "provenance" or "PROVIDENCE" that I allegedly don't understand?<br /><br />Are you hittin' the sauce by any chance?The whole truthhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07219999357041824471noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-26068593318557643012013-02-25T22:57:23.798-08:002013-02-25T22:57:23.798-08:00"That's exactly what you got you asshat.&..."That's exactly what you got you asshat."<br /><br />lol<br /><br />You will lie on a dime to save your face but it won;t work. I pointed out that you linking to a picture with words scribbled over it was bone headed lazy and told the person that you were responding both that the dates may or may not be accurate but that they should insist that you link to the data that determines the LAYER AGES that you used scribbled over your photo not your bone lazy pictures with geological eras scribbled on them AS evidence. <br /><br />So you are lying on not one or two issues but now four or five. I never stated anywhere the dating was definitely wrong and I said he should seek real data for the ages of the LAYERS as you stated they were. A s I have explained and you seemn incapable of grasping - Young over old relative dating means nothing to me. Sorry presents no issue<br /><br />If you had a modicum of sense you would look at the paper you looked at and see that only the PROVIDENCE is indicated to have been dated directly in that extract with actual radiometric data not the layer which sorry boy blue goes to exactly what I was stating and that is the layers are not synonymous with the dated aged of the provenance.<br /><br />Right up to this moment you are oblivious to the fact that rocks are OFTEN not dated by radiometric dating as you implied to the poor chap who might have believed you but by fossils<br /><br />In your blithering ignorance you continue to insist that the issue was relative dating when it was in fact an issue of specifically dating the LAYER that I pointed to<br /><br />and for the record I am not mad at all. I find you and your lack of self control and sensibility amusing. I even find your second account or crony above amusing that like you after completely misunderstanding the term provenance tries to sham his way through without a point.<br /><br />I also find it wildly humorous that you think that any question you could ask me after your bunglings would make me afraid. I just won't let you dodge answering questions and then demand answers in the hypocritical way that you do. <br /><br />I'll be able to return in a few days. DO try and come up with something better than the sorry excuses you have made for dodging questions while demanding answers from others.<br /><br />and TWT buy a modicum of decency somewhere. Whatever you think of the owner he allows you to post here (why I have no idea) which deserves some respect. See? Harris is incorrect. You don't display morality without God even with something as simple as respecting people's online property.Elijah2012https://www.blogger.com/profile/02729894330690030276noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-44092956724245034412013-02-25T22:28:44.721-08:002013-02-25T22:28:44.721-08:00Nic
I'm sorry It's taken so long to respo...<i>Nic<br /><br />I'm sorry It's taken so long to respond. I'm working on selling a business and it's eating up more of my time and attention right now. So forgive me if I take a while to respond for the next while.</i><br /><br />No worries. A few more blustering but dirt-ignorant Creationists showed up to spice up the party. One flaps his hands and makes even more unsupported assertions than you do. ;)<br /><br />Best of luck for success in the business sale. I'll be pulling for you.Ghostriderhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04686873801972423841noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-36309288287294818242013-02-25T22:18:07.888-08:002013-02-25T22:18:07.888-08:00elijah, why are you afraid to answer the questions...elijah, why are you afraid to answer the questions? <br /><br />The owner of this blog, along with many of his sycophants, is "rude, condescending and mean spirited to" scientists, science supporters, evolutionists, and anyone who questions or opposes his/their religious "position". Is the dumb and dumber picture Cornelius posted supposed to be complimentary? What would 'Jesus' say? The whole truthhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07219999357041824471noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-26940103761498261832013-02-25T22:08:15.905-08:002013-02-25T22:08:15.905-08:00The demand you put forward was to provide dating i...The demand you put forward was to provide dating information on the different formations in the unconformity. <b>That's exactly what you got you asshat.</b> The two different formations are of course made up of rocks of different ages in their strata, but the two formations are of easily distinguishable non-contiguous ages.<br /><br />You glommed onto one unimportant word you don't understand and started screaming like a stuck pig just to create a distraction. You got even madder when no one would fall for your ignorant Creationist bullshit.<br /><br />And <b>do</b> lecture us about being rude when you jumped into the middle of a civil conversation between Nic and myself just to run your big mouth and take pot shots at scientists.<br /><br />Now asshat, last chance. Provide <b>your</b> mechanism for the formation of angular unconformities or go suck a fat one.<br /><br />Lying dishonest Creationist dumbass.<br /><br />Ghostriderhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04686873801972423841noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-10755603477248630682013-02-25T22:07:57.126-08:002013-02-25T22:07:57.126-08:00Thorton,
"LOL! No Nic, you've got it bas...Thorton,<br /><br />"LOL! No Nic, you've got it bass ackwards again.<br /> It's not my job to prove a negative."<br /><br />It is when you make the claim. It's a fallacy to argue you can't prove a negative. It's done all the time.<br /><br />"I already described why they couldn't be created rapidly..."<br /><br />No you haven't, you've simply asserted it. "<br /><br />"all those processes are known to take an extremely long time."<br /><br />They do in most circumstances, that's true. That however, does not mean they could not have formed quickly in the past and could not do so in the present.<br /><br />What we see geologically appears to be the result of catastrophic processes, not gradualism. Tectonic plate activity especially appears to be a result of a catastrophic event, or series of events.<br /><br />"If you claim all could happen in 40 days (or a year) you need to explain how."<br /><br />There was a lot more involved in the flood that forty days of rain. Perhaps you need to read the account again, my friend.<br /><br />"Sorry Nic, that's part of the evidence we have to account for. In science you don't get to ignore data you don't like. Tell me this at least - even if the absolute dates are wrong, why do the two layers always show vastly different dates if they were created at the same time?"<br /><br />There are simply too many things which can affect materials in the course of their decomposition. Again, we are simply dealing with assumptions concerning decomposition rates. Because a particular material in normal circumstances decomposes at a particular rate does not mean it will not be affected by outside forces which can affect that rate. <br /><br />"Thanks again, we did, but the traffic sucked out loud and in three colors. Worst I've personally ever experienced."<br /><br />I live in a vastly smaller city than LA, but have driven in LA. I think I prefer the drivers there over the drivers here. However, the volume of traffic can be a problem. I assume it is to that which you refer. <br /><br />"I'm equally sure you won't be providing it."<br /><br />I don't really see the necessity of long ages in the formation of tar pits.<br /><br />"BTW, how's that reading on the K-Pg boundary layer coming? Got any explanations for it yet?"<br /><br />Still reading, but I'm not being convinced that it results from asteroid impacts.<br /><br />"Sharks finally broke their losing streak, maybe they can get hot like the Leafs. Next game is at Chicago so it will be tough."<br /><br />Your Sharks are having a bit of a slump, but not to worry, they've got too much talent not to get to the playoffs. I'm trying not to get too hyped over the Leafs play yet. I've waited a long time for them to play this well, I just hope it lasts.<br /><br />One of their best players is a son of a guy I was friends with in University. That makes watching them a little more fun. <br /><br />I'm sorry It's taken so long to respond. I'm working on selling a business and it's eating up more of my time and attention right now. So forgive me if I take a while to respond for the next while.Nichttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08693133888203943510noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-85459183924974096492013-02-25T21:55:18.521-08:002013-02-25T21:55:18.521-08:00Elijah2012
The question is not unanswerable
Then...<i>Elijah2012<br /><br />The question is not unanswerable</i><br /><br />Then you answer it. I said I don't know, which is still a perfectly valid answer in science despite your Creationist asshattery.<br /><br /><i>Your side's sorry rationale anytime anything real and serious is asked of you in regard to how a feature function or instinct evolved is to invoke the we don't know but we know it did Evolution of the gaps gambit</i><br /><br />Yeah yeah we know the Creationist Liar's Creedo by heart now dumbass: "science doesn't know <b>everything</b> so that means science doesn't know <b>anything!!</b><br /><br />That's just one of many reasons why the scientific community doesn't take you clowns seriously.<br /><br /><i>like I said answer the question or you don't have a leg to stand on demanding any of your questions be answered.</i><br /><br />I did answer the question. Lying about it won't help you.<br /><br />Now where's your Creationist explanation for the formation of angular unconformities? You came in here shooting your mouth off and declaring the standard geology explanation to be all wrong, so <b>tell us what the "right" one is. </b><br /><br />Put up or shut up Creationist dumbass.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Ghostriderhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04686873801972423841noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-54391696964668042592013-02-25T21:49:43.712-08:002013-02-25T21:49:43.712-08:00TWH Go do some reading. You are showing yourself ...TWH Go do some reading. You are showing yourself to have no clue . You are as bad as thornton (or under a different account name the same as). Provenance is what a rock consists of. It is not an agency for anything its the result of other agencies. I read you guys and you are rude, condescending and mean spirited to the owner of this blog and then when a new term comes along you just all show your own ignorance precisely as you accuse others of.Elijah2012https://www.blogger.com/profile/02729894330690030276noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-16899800268791930242013-02-25T21:39:11.727-08:002013-02-25T21:39:11.727-08:00elijah, what is your "position" as to th...elijah, what is your "position" as to the age of the Earth?The whole truthhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07219999357041824471noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-35288292969431580252013-02-25T21:30:07.308-08:002013-02-25T21:30:07.308-08:00The question is not unanswerable and he never aske...The question is not unanswerable and he never asked for infinite detail. You are lying . go read it and stop ducking by invoking some self serving dodge while invoking science as your excuse for NOT answering. your downright hypocrisy is that if a creationist were to tell you its too long ago and no one knows for any question you had you'd be all over that and most certainly would not take that for a scientific answer. you'd be "dumbass creationist" all over that dodge. Wake up grow up and stop being a hypocrite.<br /><br />Your side's sorry rationale anytime anything real and serious is asked of you in regard to how a feature function or instinct evolved is to invoke the we don't know but we know it did Evolution of the gaps gambit. Its no better than the God of the gaps you are always claiming Creationists use but you hypocritically criticize while doing the same thing.<br /><br />like I said answer the question or you don't have a leg to stand on demanding any of your questions be answered. If you do when I come back I'll answer yours although frankly you have to have a screw loose if you think since my position does not limit me to even tens of thousands of years angular unconformities pose any problem to me.<br /><br />So answer the question, stop being a hypocrite and we can talk when I return. Try and dodge, hand wave around not answering, making more demands that when asked of you you don't live up to and no should even bother answering you on anything. Elijah2012https://www.blogger.com/profile/02729894330690030276noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-59268631000038678962013-02-25T21:08:39.894-08:002013-02-25T21:08:39.894-08:00"Debating me you would have to stick strictly..."Debating me you would have to stick strictly to radiometric dating because relative dating of one younger rock on top of older wouldn't phase my position in the least."<br /><br />What about several or many formations (or members, units, layers, etc.) on top of an older formation, with or without some uncomformities thrown in? <br /><br />And are you saying that just the "breaking of Pangea" and "DA FLOOD" are the reason and the explanation (including the "provenance") for all of the sedimentary, metamorphic, and volcanic formations (or members, units, layers, etc.) on Earth? <br /><br /><br />The whole truthhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07219999357041824471noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-32092556874309139542013-02-25T20:54:34.232-08:002013-02-25T20:54:34.232-08:00I realize you dirt-ignorant Creationists only unde...I realize you dirt-ignorant Creationists only understand argument from Authority, but "I don't know" is a perfectly valid and honest answer in science.<br /><br />And I never said no one should ask questions. I merely pointed out the hypocrisy of IDiots like you who demand infinite detail from science but provide <b>NONE</b> of your own.<br /><br />Now where's your Creationist explanation for the formation of angular unconformities?<br /><br />Dumbass Creationist.Ghostriderhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04686873801972423841noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-84449736607834746192013-02-25T20:49:00.934-08:002013-02-25T20:49:00.934-08:00"But I did answer nat's question you self..."But I did answer nat's question you selfish little man. The honest answer is science doesn't know the level of details he wants."<br /><br />SO umm "I don't know.....I can't answer the question. You should not ask the question of me" is answering a question? Bye Thornton. study hard and take a course on logic when you get to college. Elijah2012https://www.blogger.com/profile/02729894330690030276noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-75324422399402423782013-02-25T20:41:15.901-08:002013-02-25T20:41:15.901-08:00But I did answer nat's question you selfish li...But I <b>did</b> answer nat's question you selfish little man. The honest answer is science doesn't know the level of details he wants. Science may never know the details of things that happened a billion years in the past. That in no way shape or form negates what science <b>does</b> know.<br /><br />Now where's your Creationist explanation for the formation of angular unconformities?Ghostriderhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04686873801972423841noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3855268335402896473.post-14747391584269032252013-02-25T20:36:18.278-08:002013-02-25T20:36:18.278-08:00TH answer Nats question that he asked long before ...TH answer Nats question that he asked long before and you ran from answering and when I have time and come back we can take up your question. Your strategy of not answering and trying too hide that you have not answered him by asking questions of your own doesn't work with adults. Elijah2012https://www.blogger.com/profile/02729894330690030276noreply@blogger.com